Thursday, September 17, 2026

Infested By Humans

 

If this "baby" really was to become the last one, then the main problem wouldn't have been his somewhat weird looks, but his male gender: After all, men still can't give birth, so this last baby would have been the end of it all = NO MORE HUMANS. What's needed is a baby girl and some semen on ice. However, if there were none of either it would not have been bad news to the planet ....

If some modern "Space-romantics" had their way, humans should take possession of other, hitherto people-free planets. Actually, they want them/us to spread all over Space which would be very bad news for a lot of planets.


Exploitations of the resources and not thinking of keeping the balance of Nature is what humans have brought everywhere they come on this planet. Some know that that's the case, but don't really care, as they don't see the problems as something that concerns them. They sort of "send the bill off to future generations" which is a very shallow and egomaniac way of thinking. 


A lot of animals, plants and Nature sceneries on planet Earth would rejoice at the information, that the very last human child was a boy, but baby-romantics of today get shocked at the very thought. However, these days men are not as needed as they themselves think, and many women chose not to let the father of the child they do want to have into their private lives. In some ways men of today are paying the bills of the subjection of women of former generations and foreign cultures ....


https://www.reddit.com/r/freedomgold/s/yqbOBkZjyf 

 

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Redacted Poem By Else Cederborg: "Cain And Abel In The Air"

 

 

 

 

Cain And Abel In The Air 

 

I saw a big bird today, white as innocence

No wait, I saw a picture of a big white bird today

and actually, there were not one, but two birds


One very big and ferocious, out for a kill

the other smaller and a victim for a murderer in feathers

Yeah, and both were in the air, flapping their wings


The one was being eaten alive by the other one

a beak deep inside its back, but none the less alive

what struck me was their twin quality, Cain and Abel

the killer was a seagull and so was its victim

forever the big Cain killing his smaller brother Abel


By the way, do seagulls eat seagulls?

Well, do humans obliterate humans, turn them into nothing?


And didn't I avert my eyes from this unbearable cruelty

because it wasn't real, only a picture of something, real or not?

Yes, it's tempting to stick with the pictures and throw out

what's only all too real in a world of cruel realities?

 

All-Rights-Reserved © Else Cederborg

 

      .............................................................................................................................................................

 

And yes, this is part of my ongoing, recent broodings about the relationship of words and pictures that started with reading this statement: "A picture may say more than 1000 words ...."



Tuesday, September 8, 2026

Words And Pictures - What A Couple!

As we know, when one wants to communicate something, one may chose different ways of doing so. For a very long time "The Word" itself was what brought insight. It's a recognized, strong tool, and according to The Bible (Genesis I) it was the tool of "God" himself: Yahweh spoke, and Woopsy, the Universe came into existence, actually out of nothing.  So this transformation was brought about by a command in words. However, what ended up in the written words we know today must have started out in spoken words, e.g. by priests or so. And, of course, before these spoken words became written, they have changed and changed as well as been elaborated on through many centuries. Nothing wrong or strange in that, because that's how fables and fairy-tales worked in the early times of the human history.

  Yahweh on a winged chariot 

However, later on the strong tool of Yahweh, the word, was reused by not always all that godly humans, both for ordinary communications, but also for inventing their own "universes" in form of stories. Still, the word stayed strong and magical. As it is, it didn't get challenged until humans started to use more pictures for communicating reflections and ideologies. Religious pictures, like for instance the one of Yahweh on his winged chariot, developed into much more intricate formations, as did the word. 

Such a picture, as e.g. this one from "The Middle Ages", tells an intricate story with several layers of understanding. Actually there are so many that we in our time period may not get to understand all of them, as neither words nor images may age well. To mediate everything in this picture would be difficult for the word to do on its own - strong or not. And what's more, the word works with making pictures, so why not elude any intricazies by aiming directly at the picture that one's words were to mediate? I would say, that that's only possible when the message is simple or a good representation of a very well-known phenomenon. In that case it's more like an illustration than anything else. 

(Artist: Jens Galshiøt) 

This crucified, pregnant woman gets its most potent symbol from the cross which alludes to the crucifiction of Jesus, but if we didn't know that story, it would be a strange piece of art indeed. There would be many different interpretations, and none of them would cover all of the implications of this specific artwork. The need for words would be felt very strongly by those who really, really wanted to know what this was about. Others, who saw it, might end up in 1) Disgust at the cruelty or 2) Disgust at the nakedness of this poor murdered woman, and both of that kind of disgusts would only be part of the message of this specific piece of art. 


Sunday, September 6, 2026

tRump And Some Non-Loving Cartoons


OK, I admit it, I just love cartoons like this one: Evil, but in a somewhat subtle manner. As much as I despise The Orange Conman, I prefer the subtle when it comes to him. Instead of Hell, Satan, eternal fires  and brimstones, a kind of fiasco of one of his ridiculous projects is more fitting. Not because I've turned soft on him, but because I think that shall hit harder. Bad EC? Maybe, but that's OK with me because I feel that whatever not-so-pleasant that may happen to him is well-deserved. His idea of renaming a Canadian lake into "Lake America" looks like a joke, but that may not even be the case as he over and over has proved to be totally without any feelings for the appropriate when it comes to the belongings of other countries. 


I'm sure many both in and out of America have dreamt of seeing something like this Ai-drawing turning real. Not that I can blame them as my wishes for getting him to stand trial for crimes that should have sent him behind bars many years ago, may be even more cruel. After standing trial, he should get jailed, but also being sent on a hot date with Old Sparky - a very hot date, that is .... 


When I see cartoons like this one, I find it difficult to un-see, so to speak, because that seems to be his attitude to everything and everyone who need help - or just an act of justice that is unpleasant for him. It's touching that some of his deluded voters, who have lost a lot, e.g. by his cloaked extra-taxes, (also called tariffs), write him, asking for help, but it's sad that they expect to get it.


The "Growth", such as it is, is for the 1% who are rich beyond belief, and there it stands. If there is a "TrickleDown" it hasn't been felt yet, and it's the same with those enormous number of new jobs that the voters were promised. Most of the vanity projects may be laughable, like for instance the totally undeserved "Arch of Triumph", that is being built for tax-payer-money. What covers that idea is best described by Hans Christian Andersen in his fairy-tale about the vain emperor who buys new clothes, but ends up naked.


 

Tuesday, September 1, 2026

"Bravery Supreme", Poem By Else Cederborg


 

Poem from my book, "Knees Bent", Author House 

    

Bravery Supreme


Doing as much as one can

hoping against hope

that's bravery supreme


All Rights Reserved©Else Cederborg

Saturday, August 29, 2026

Tancrede Dumas (1830-1905)

 

I've often seen, and noticed, this photo of a remarkable couple of close friends from The Middle East: A blind man carries a paralyzed man on his back, thus making a workable unity. By helping each other as best they can, both of them are able to move along, one being the eyes of both, and the other one the feet. One of the interesting things about this solution to the difficult lives of disabled men in the Middle East is that one of them is a Christian and the other one is a Muslim, but still they are able to work together. The photo is tagged "Tancrede Dumas", and somehow I got the impression that that was the name of one of these men, but it's actually the name of the photographer who took the photo.

Tancrede Dumas (1830-1905)

His parents were fervent supporters of Napoleon, who had to leave their native France to seek refuge in Italy. That's why Tancrede Dumas most often is called an Italian. He was some kind of adventurer, who tried his luck in several different professions. For instance, he was also a banker, but at the same time he offered pianos to buy or hire. His job as a photographer must have started some time in the middle of the 1860ies when he founded a studio in Constantinople with some others. However, in 1866 he started his own studio in Beirut, actually in the consulate quarter. That, I suppose, must have been valuable to him as it must have given him good opportunities with the so-called "elite". For instance, he accompanied The Archduke of Mecklenburg on his journey to the Orient, thus attaining the right to introduce himself as "Photographer To The Imperial And Royal Court of Prussia".  


The journey with The Archduke must have been of value to Tancrede in several ways. For instance, he also had the opportunity to follow The American Palestine Exploration in 1875 as the assigned photographer. His published collections of photographs from this kind of expeditions must be of high value to e.g. historians, as they tell about life as it was lived in the Orient at that time. As a photographer Tancrede was a witness to a world of yesterday. This, for instance, is a photo of snake charmers:


It seems that it's well-known that his work included several more albums or portfolios which have not been found yet. However, when he died in 1905 his legacy was - and is - impressive.

 

https://www.gettyimages.no/photos/tancrede 

 

https://luminous-lint.com/phoenix.php/photographers/single/Tancrede__Dumas/biography/ 

 

Wikipedia 

Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Some Considerations About The Uses of Religion

Some people will be horryfied at the implications of such a statement, but others will nod in agreement. However, as it is, the latter group may be the one which consists of more true believers than the first one. "How come?" you may ask, not believing your own ears. The first group are confirmedcChurch-goers, which the second one isn't, so how are they maybe more true believers than people who attend sermon after sermon? Well, to attend sermons and bleat religious hymns without much understanding of what they are about, is not a religious act, but it certainly is a social one: Religion is a way of bringing  "order" to a society in the conformity-manner. "Bend your knees, bleat with me and remember the religious slurs of our community. When doing that, you shall be fine."

Those ardent Church-goers often seem to be beset by thought, ideas and even plans which not exactly equal devotions. The so-called main-religions - and maybe even others - have attained a suppression function in society that has nothing to do with spirituality or a deeply heart-felt wish of "getting close to God, whoever this particular deity is". On the contrary, it's more like a "I shall twist you arm until it breaks if you don't come to see eye to eye with me when it comes to religion". The arm-twister may even see him-/herself as a true believer, a "swordsman" for God which is totally crazy. 

 


Yup, that's how it has been used for ages, but humans are the ones who enslave other humans, not "God" and not "Satan", who are nothing but figments of the imagination of numerous generations of humans. No matter what, it's interesting how these intricate fantasy-figures have grown into tools for suppression, but it makes one wonder at how it shall be in the future. The "2025-project" in the USA set out to turn a thoroughly Capitalistic society into what they see as Christian, but which we know is anything but that ....