The Female Embalmer Who Had Sex With The Dead

Some male serial killers have told about how they had sex with some of their victims several days ofter killing them. They just couldn't let go of these lifeless objects of desires and lust, but had to keep their dead bodies and interact sexually with them. Some even have suggested that sex with a corpse was better than with the living ones. It's my impression that the true name of that game is COTROL: The dead woman can't say or do something that the rapist feels upset about. 

 

 

And then there is this woman, who wasn't a serial killer or had killer-intentions. No, she didn't kill her victims, but she did have sex with them, namely after their death: She was a necrophiliac.

  

Karen Margaret Greenlee (born 1958) 

"Have sex with" doesn't quite cover the meaning of what she did, because being dead her rape victims - and rape it was - really didn't have any kind of say in what happened to them. She, being alive, was 100% in command which may very likely be what turned her on. I, for one, think it's the ability to decide what's going to happen - or nor happen - that's the what these people desire the most.

A drawing by Greenlee illustrating her perspective on necrophilia 

In time there have been many rumors of dead women being raped by males in all kinds of service jobs. The jobs in focus are the ones which are connected with hospitals or cemetaries, but this is the first case I've seen with a female culprit - and culprit she is.

In 1979, when Karen Greenlee was a 23 year old apprentice embalmer, she stole a hearse in Sacramento with a dead man's body inside it. She wasn't to be found for a couple of days. However, she left a written 4.5 page confession admitting to having had sex with 20 to 40 corpses. Obviously, California didn't suspect ever to see criminal cases like this one, as they had no necrophilia laws. That's why Karen Greenlee only got a ridiculous verdict of 11 days in jail and a $255 fine. It clearly reveals the legal status of the dead: None! By dying these citizens have been left without any rights, which I find wrong. Dead or alive they shouldn't be robbed of their rights as (former) citizens.   

 

Here she is, 23 years old, a culprit, but also - according to her father - a victim of rape as a very young child, and once again as a teenager. Could it be the lack of control that a rape victim experiences that later on turned her into a rapist of dead bodies? To me that seems quite logical, but maybe a wee bit too easy as an explanation.  - After her verdict Karen changed her name and sort of "disappeared" from the public eye.

 
https://open.spotify.com/episode/5iYIKxV42pvhKcLf2GtK3Q

 

https://www.audible.co.uk/podcast/Necrophile-Hall-of-Shame-David-Fuller-and-Karen-Greenlee/B0DM8NFL85 

 

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13676676/ 

 

https://youtu.be/K0xQepN0LZU?si=r24s9yvf4q9nsUG6 

 

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1556-4029.15675 

 

Wikipedia 

 

 

"Quiet, Piggy!!!!"

  

I think it happened on November 14, 2025, and it's an incident that is already legendary. A lot of tRumpian incidents are born to be just that: Legendary, not to be forgotten or glossed over, but this one has a special appeal, because it's gross: The scenery was Air Force one when tRump told White House correspondent Catherine Lucey to shut up when she asked him a question about the Epstein files. His misogynistic wording has become legendary in itself. It's been quoted over and over as the "trademark" of a man who can't abide women in any sort of power position, which obviously is how he sees a journalist. What he said was: "Quiet, Piggy!"

Catherine Lucey isn't a "piggy" which might be translated into "disgustingly fat, way beyond obese", but had that been the case, it shouldn't have been his concern as it's private. You may not like how people look, but it's none of your business and should not be commented. Actually, a comment on somebody's looks goes far beyond what's acceptable. When tRump mocked a disabled male journalist that was even more derogatory because there was no doubt about his disability. That means that we move from looks to something that goes beyond that, as a disability isn't a choice, but something that's inflicted on one. With the female journalist, Catherine Lucey, there might be a question of "interpreting" her looks: Is she or isn't she a disgusting glutton who has eaten herself into a "piggy" physical state? I would say "NO, she isn't", but still, she would have a right to do so: 

No matter what, it's obvious that female journalists are in for a fight when meeting tRump as there has been several incidents that go far beyond a professional disagreement. However, the Piggy-remark is the - until now - grossest one and it's not to be forgotten.

https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/2025/11/18/trump-tells-reporter-quiet-piggy-after-epstein-email-question/87334816007/ 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/18/business/media/trump-reporter-khashoggi-saudis.html 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-attack-female-reporter-maggie-haberman-b3041485.html 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2026/08/30/donald-trump-kristen-welker-fcc-meet-the-press/91536303007/ 

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Trumpvirus/s/svVe7DrbYl

Seemingly The String is Tightening

Larry Ellison is a right-wing Jew, Zionist and a dedicated tRump-supporter. And what's more, he is also the world's sixth-richest person. A fact which should make us prick up our ears if we agree with G.K. Chesterton: "The rich are the scum of the earth in every country." His more or less total media control seems to be/is all due to Donald Trump, the so-called president who "won" (???) the 2024 election after what must be called shady ongoings. That means that by now tRump is the media mogul through his supporter and friend, Larry Ellison, and for those who are not fans of tRump the situation is getting creepier and creepier. By now it's obvious that he has moved ahead of all assumptions of what was supposed to be THE FUTURE OF THE PLANET EARTH. He is following his own agenda and seems to be a step or more ahead of what was taken for granted to be the situation here and now. I take it that only the top-guys of the Republican party really knows what's going on. Not a pleasant thought, to say the least, as the man is a convicted criminal who is also attacking the Hague international criminal court while at the same time pushing for his "America first"-ideas that include some far-fetched demands of "letting the USA have what it wants to have". Something which seems to include other countries and their riches: Grifters are grabbers as long as we let them do what they do .... 

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/GlobalNews/s/E1HQEE4tx7 

 

The Winner Is: Word or Image?

 

This is my late friend, the Danish poet Marianne Larsen (1951-2025), who sadly enough died in December 2025 without me getting to know anything about it until a couple of months later. A very strange, shocking and altogether unpleasant experience. Actually it was so awful, that it triggered some memories, which I more or less had forgotten. These memories were about one of our discussions about WORDS CONTRA PICTURES in communications of various art. She was convinced that the word still had the upper-hand over the picture as to communication, but I wasn't all that sure because it can't be denied that the world has changed its priorities, and that one of these is "easiness/spiritual laziness" is the most peasant to most people and thus the best . 

 

The mere image of a MAGA-cap speaks volumes of certain characteristics of the man wearing it like e.g. prejudice, stupidity, science-immunity, misogyny, arrogance and so on and on. The cap does this, all by itself, because it is nourished by non-MAGAs's political standpoints of the opposite kind. Also, as it is, people who are not MAGAs need many more words to explain what their opinions are than the man in the cap. In that respect the image, e.g. of a gesture or a symbol, has the upper-hand over the words: In the flash of a moment one is able to get the image "translated" into the full meaning of it. For instance, all of us know what it means to raise one's right hand in a straight line, looking sinister - or stupid? - and the ones who do just that don't even have to say "heil Hitler" to get the message through: They are not into Democracy, on the contrary, and it was made clear without any words to explain it.

 

That goes with flags too: Each one speaks without words, and they have a strong message for everyone who knows them and recognizes the ones that belongs to his/her native country and biography.  

This is one of the many poems by Marianne, and as is obvious it speaks in its own voice. Her command of language and imagery was impressive and something that was recognized from the very beginning of her career. However, our discussions were about COMMUNICATION as such, and that's where it - like all or most poems - may not cover her intentions. Compared to the MAGA-hat or the fully stretched right arm a poem simply doesn't come out clear with its message. The reason for that is that it covers many more symbolic layers than a hat or an arm, both of which is much more simple symbols. However, it wasn't only my discussions with Marianne that made me brood the question of what was the strongest form of communication, but also some experiences I had with some of my own books, like e.g. this one:

 

, 

I've had some offers from people I don't know, but who introduce themselves as publishers or film makers. Most of them are nothing but conmen, out to earn a substantial sum by cheating an author out of money to have his/her book turned into a  movie. At first it feels quite flattering, but it's anything but flattery as they wouldn't try their luck if they took you for a genius. On the contrary, they feel that an Indie author is hungry for attention and thus ready to pay to get it. As I've pubished books both as an "Indie" and with ordinary publishers I'm glad to say that I'm not a push-over for this kid of flattery. That being said, I did fall for this specific attempt to bleed me because it was very  well prepared: The one, who wrote me, "borrowed" the name, the address, etc. of a well-known Hollywood-producer, but with the help of someone who keeps an eye on all the scummy ongoings in the literary world, I found out that the man who wrote me in reality was a Philipine conman, who had targeted several authors whom he tried to bleed.

 

What I find the most interesting part of that incident is that people I know were so very interested in the possibility of the book being turned into a movie. None of them ever asked me about how the book was doing or what it was about, but they kept asking questions like "will it be on Netflix?" Or"Who is to play X?" It was very obvious that they had no intentions of reading the book, but that they would cosider watching a movie over it - This experience is why I told my friend, Marianne, the word-loving poet, that words had lost to the images and pictures ....

 

 

https://boobytrapec.blogspot.com/2026/09/words-contra-pictures-what-couple.html

https://boobytrapec.blogspot.com/2026/09/redacted-poem-by-else-cederborg-cain.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

Poem by Else Cederborg: "Non-Normal Dancing"

 Dancing in and out of nothingness

tip-toeing like on red hot tiles

calling it normal 

which it's not ....

 

All Rights Reserved © Else Cederborg

 

When The Exploited And Abused One Is A Human Being

 

This looks like blatant exploitation, and if there is no compensation in form of extra food, money or whatever is needed in a prison, it's even double-exploitation as these men are being treated like soulless robots. They may have committed heinous crimes to land in prison, but according to our morally based judicial system, they are supposed to be able to pay off their guilt by losing their freedom, not by being exploited as workers.

 

Female child coal miner in UK 

Awful work conditions have been the fate of many men and women in the past, and we know they at the same time have been exploited in other ways, which robs them of their humanity. Sexual abuse may be part of the exploitation without being reported. Loads of everyday cruelties in work conditions may have gone unnoticed and thus unrecognized as what they are. They should have been kept in historical documents, kept for younger generations to see and learn from, but weren't. 

This incident was such a shock to me to read about that I lost every respect for Amazon, I've ever had. As it is, some of my books with Author House and a couple of my minor translations are still on Amazon, but they were put there by the publishers, not by me, the author or translator, and there isn't really anything I can do about it. That said, I suppose I might delete my profile, but I've chosen not to do so, as I want to keep an eye on what's going on at the platform. However, I decided not to publish new books with Amazon, although I've some ready for publishing because of the incident with the worker dying on the floor.  By this callous treatment of a worker, Amazon sort of robbed him of his human qualities, but the obvious point is that he was a HUMAN who deserved more than this.

Amazon has been targeted as an awful working place even before this incident, and the fact that nothing seems to happen to better conditions is a WARNING SIGNAL that should not go unnoticed. I bet many other working places are doing what Amazon does, and it reminds me of the fable of the frog on the stove: Sitting in a bowl of water it feels quite comfortable, and it dosn't even move when then water is getting warmer. Unfortunately for the frog, it stays put, until the water is boiling, and then it's too late to jump out into safety ....

https://novaramedia.com/2026/04/16/amazon-employees-made-to-load-trucks-around-dying-colleague/ 

 

Wikipedia

Infested By Humans

 

If this "baby" really was to become the last one, then the main problem wouldn't have been his somewhat weird looks, but his male gender: After all, men still can't give birth, so this last baby would have been the end of it all = NO MORE HUMANS. What's needed is a baby girl and some semen on ice. However, if there were none of either it would not have been bad news to the planet ....

If some modern "Space-romantics" had their way, humans should take possession of other, hitherto people-free planets. Actually, they want them/us to spread all over Space which would be very bad news for a lot of planets.

Exploitations of the resources and not thinking of keeping the balance of Nature is what humans have brought everywhere they come on this planet. Some know that that's the case, but don't really care, as they don't see the problems as something that concerns them. They sort of "send the bill off to future generations" which is a very shallow and egomaniac way of thinking. 

A lot of animals, plants and Nature sceneries on planet Earth would rejoice at the information, that the very last human child was a boy, but baby-romantics of today get shocked at the very thought. However, these days men are not as needed as they themselves think, and many women chose not to let the father of the child they do want to have into their private lives. In some ways men of today are paying the bills of the subjection of women of former generations and foreign cultures ....

https://www.reddit.com/r/freedomgold/s/yqbOBkZjyf