This "new, artificial Jennifer" whom one might chat with was created on Character.ai and they were forced to close it down. However, the shock of something like that will linger on which makes it obvious that this is a public area that needs to be restricted by laws as soon as possible.
REAL Jennifer
https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/cltr/ai-daughter.html
Wikipedia
When people in The Western countries talk of Muhammad's wife they most often think of Aisha, the 6 years old girl, he married, "consummating their marriage" when she was nine. However, he had 13 wives, and No. 7 is kind of special. Her name was Zaynab bint Jahsh and she was not only his cousin, but also his daughter-in-law as well as his wife.
HOW is that even possible??? Well, Zaynab was the daughter of the sister of Muhammad's father and thus his first cousin. She was born in 590 and died in 640/641 as one of the widows of Muhammad who had died in 632, her third husband. Little is known about the first one who seems to have died in 622, but No. 2, Zayd Ibn Harithah, started out as the slave that had been a gift from Muhammad's first wife, Khadijah. Muhammad never had a biological son which may be the reason why he adopted this slave and made him his son. Maybe he married him off to his cousin, Zaynab, to boost his status in society, but the legend is that all of a sudden Muhammad was beset by the beauty and sex appeal of his cousin + daughter-in-law, Zaynab, and poor Zayd ended up in a very, very hot spot which he tried to get out of by divorcing his wife. Not that it saved his life because it didn't: He was sent off on a military mission that (was meant to???) end with his death.
What also died was the Muslim adoption system as all of a sudden it was not seen as acceptable.
https://neareasternstudies.cornell.edu/node/9478
Wikipedia
People practicing religion - Christian or whatever - get pleasure in associating with a special community, that welcomes them as "one of us". They look at history and cultural trends and feel a bond that enriches their life. However, that doesn't mean that they are religious in the Biblical sense that they've read, understood and agree with EVERYTHING in The Bible. To them religion isn't a question of teachings, but of traditions and a church that makes it possible for people to "be together" in the "safety" of an assumed equality.
Most of them may not even understand the meaning of what Naploen said although it's common knowledge to those who don't have any affiliation with a church-community. Religion is a means of power because it upholds the system as it is in a very smart manner: Those who are repressed do the repression themselves as they don't fight it in the hope of getting their reward after death. Matthew 20:16: "So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen."
A very, very ingenuous system even though the Matthew-quote may not have been read the way it was said. Those who need consolation for awful lives will take the first part of it at face-value: My oppressors or even tormentors are being punished after death (Hail, that lovely HELL!!!!!!) while I shall "sit by the side of Jesus" in glory and supreme happiness.
Hitler and other Nazi scumbags visiting the grave of Napoleon in 1940
Napoleon became the Emperor of France, but in reality he was more like a dictator who gained power because no one stopped him.
Yes, even Napoleon was defeated, just
like most of those "strong men" of our time.
Just like most of them he too ended up beaten and robbed of the power he had gained which, of course, was seen as an instance of "God's Will" by those religious people he had mocked.
OK, animals may eat their prey alive, and we shudder at the thought, but then THEY DON'T KNOW BETTER and Ethics are not part of their being, not even as a pretence. For that kind of ideas we have to go to our own breed: Only humans KNOW that certain actions are against all written and unwritten laws of decency. Actually, that may be the very reason they do the unthinkable as e.g. skinning people alive: It's so cruel that some people like e.g. the Assyrian warriors who are skinning a couple of prisoners in this ancient rendering of the "event" would choose it as their way of execution.
As to a modern day equivalent of the Assyrian cruelty there is one instance which stands out: The live skinning of the Polish university student Katarzyna Zowada (1975–1998). She went missing on November 12, 1998, but January 6, 1999, it was known what had happened to her as her empty skin was found. It had got caught in the propeller of a tug boat.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/flaying
Wikipedia
I find it very strange that some people use the word "body" or "it" about someone who died. To me it's obvious that each individual keeps his/her identity even though they are dead. As it is I'm not blind to the possibility that this way of dehumanizing someone by changing the way they are described is a way of protecting oneself from the knowledge of one's own mortality. However, some, like e.g. Shayanna Sims, who took it upon herself to "teach the corpse of her husband's ex-girlfriend a lesson", clearly didn't see death as a safe haven for the deceased: The dead woman wasn't protected against her desires for revenge even in her casket at the funeral home.
The beautiful Tabatha Lynch (to the right) had died of natural causes in 2015 at the age of 38, and Shayanna Sims hated her for (presumably) having an affair with her (ex-)husband, Montie Smith. They had been lovers in their teens before Montie Smith, even met her and he denied the allegations of the affair. Still, Shayanna Sims, went on a revenge spree, slashing the corpse, cutting her hair off, removing body parts and stealing her jewelry after cheating her way into her home. Dead or alive, she was "the enemy"!
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/woman-corpse-face-slash-america-17348604
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/legally-weird/what-are-the-penalties-for-desecrating-the-dead/
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article146492954.html
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/chat/20180913/281599536384013
Adele Hugo (1830-1915) was the daughter of a very famous author who gave life to literary characters that are loved even today, Victor Hugo (1802-1885). He was very versatile as he wrote in several genres, but today he is best known for his novels, "The Hunchback of Notre-Dame" and "Les Miserables":
One of his daughters, Adele, met a weird - and sad - fate when she decided to turn her back on the world, so to speak. Her father was famous for his special gift of communication through his works, but she stopped communicating altogether after experiencing an unhappy love affair.
Wikipedia
