True, but what if you feel a FALSE HAPPINESS at something which ought to make you ANGRY for moral or personal reasons? As it is, the world being what it is, happiness isn't a fixed and perfect state of mind, but much more like an ongoing process. Sometimes one doesn't even know that a certain time in one's life contains a (rare) amount of HAPPINESS because one doesn't recognize it as such. The reason for that may be that one's focus is on something that, after all, is of less importance in the long run. To see something not good as "happiness" tie us down, and we don't even know.
I'm wondering at this case: When the fake asylum seeker in UK, Rehan Baig, was sentenced to 3 years in prison for sexually abusing his chickens as well as other animals, I wondered at the - in my opinion - much too short sentence. When raping the chickens, he killed them in a painful manner, something which was recorded on his computer along with child pornography. Still, his sentence was reduced - WHY???
And what about his wife, who seems to have engaged in some acts of a dubious character? (He alternated between having sex with the animals and his wife, which may be the reason why she preferred to see him engage in his animal abuse instead of using her as a sex toy).
According to "Quora" sex with animals is OK for Muslims: "Homosexual & sex with animals (zoophilia bestiality) are permitted in islam. Just wash your genital after that. From the website at the bottom you scroll down until you find "Commentary of Imam Al Nawawi on the Hadith of Sahih Muslim, book 003, number 0684, "Our companions have said that if the penile (penis) head has penetrated A WOMAN’S ANUS, or A MAN’S ANUS, or AN ANIMAL’S VAGINA or ITS ANUS then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive OR DEAD, YOUNG OR OLD, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully. This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can.....". The rest you read it by yourself. It's also written & explained by CP “The Deception of Allah” on p. 153, "Women are Sex Toys". Here's the webs The Qurans Confused Stance on Sexual Ethics "
"Confused"??? That's for sure and what's more, living in a Western country means following the laws of that country, not some Muslim rules!!!!
However, somehow Mr. Baig got off what should have been a much less lenient punishment for what he did, also as to other offences, e.g. concerning children: WHY???
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-leeds-54608083
The joys of the penis
Freud thought the female sex suffered from what he called "penis envy". That crazy idea seems to stem from his belief that women were just being imperfect men. Something which reminds me of the name for the female sex organs, e.g. in the time of Shakespeare: "Nothing".
Yup, women "don't have anything down there" as it can't be seen the way a penis can. Somehow, men are in awe of moveables changing form and becoming visible even though it's not in itself an accomplishment, especially not when compared to women getting pregnant, giving birth and breastfeeding their babies: That takes stamina, determination and love, also because it's a genuine strain on the body. The erection, on the other hand, is nothing but a physical reaction, in many ways much like the urge to go to the bathroom and relieve oneself of what needs to go. No matter what, there is nothing impressive in bowel movements, right? However, a male mythology has arisen in connection with the penis and the erection, which go on a lot of biassed notions of male achievements.
Henry VIII of England (1491-1547)
In his attempt to father a legitimate son, two wives of Henry VIII were executed. That's a high price to pay for his vanity, but without a male heir his royal name and house would evaporate at his death, which was one of his main concerns. It was with great pride he told his doctors of his being able to have three nightly sperm releases in his sleep, as that was something he saw as a grand proof of his masculinity and virility. Nothing pleased him more than his own maleness and the way he saw it. Actually, that interpretation of what's mere bodily functions is quite important to understand what's going on ideologically: Erections are seen as achievements. I bet rhinoceroses, who have been hunted mercilessly for their horns, which are seen as good for the male potency, will disagree.
https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/sigmund-freud-and-penis-envy-failure-courage
https://boobytrapec.blogspot.com/2024/06/blue-as-balls.html
https://boobytrapec.blogspot.com/2025/01/bodily-discharges.html
Wikipedia
https://www.newsweek.com/michigan-laurie-pohutsky-sterilization-surgery-donald-trump-2027862
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/women-enslaved-human-farm-egg-34638315?
Wikipedia