Bodily Discharges

To visit certain pages on e.g. Reddit - which I often do - means to see LOADS of "male words of wisdom" upon the subject of that, to the male sex, "annoying, biological phenomenon" of periods. It's obvious that this specific female "problem" has never been popular with men in patriarchal societies although some turn it into a more or less funny joke. However, this one sums up the situation in a more true than funny manner:

These extremely unpopular periods have many funny names. Not all of them are even condemnations of this natural biological phenomenon:

Modern people ought to know both the biology of women and of men well enough not to make wrong statements about either of them. As it is some male debaters get very upset when their crazy notions and suggestions are being repelled and put down as false claims of "the truth" about women and their biology. 

The fact that they even try to impose their crazy notions and definitions, which obviously stem more from wishes of being the definers than a genuine biological knowledge, is very revealing of their "masculine policies".

Yes, this is one more instance of the strong urge many modern men feel to define women in any way possible, especially when it comes to biology. One of the persistent, male contentions I often see on the net is that of inherent physical impurities of women in form of various forms of so-called "discharges", which most often may be translated into periods. In some societies - and religions - women are still considered "impure" when menstruating: They are seen as "unclean" because they have blood discharges.

The regularity of these "floods of blood" drives many men mad, and on Reddit I've seen male suggestions that women should "hold it back" until a less inconvenient time for the man. The very idea is ludicrous, and makes one - ME!!! - want to point out something that somehow has escaped the notice of Patriarchy: Just as women have these "discharges" so have men, only it's not blood, but what some might call "snot down there", also called "Semen". A discharge is a discharge, but semen isn't seen that way. In Patriarchy it has achieved an almost mythic connotation with men which I, who luckily enough am not a man, find ridiculous. When I've read that some frustrated incel-boy is dreaming of doing this or that to impress a woman with his loads of semen i find it hard not to laugh out loud.

And don't forget that some of what men see as that wonderful white-grey fluid may be a discharge of a special art: ".... not all discharge from the penis is semen. Discharge may indicate the presence of a sexually transmitted infection (STI). It may also indicate urinary incontinence, or unintentional urine loss." Not to speak of "Smegma": "Smegma is a harmless combination of oils, skin cells, sweat and other fluids that accumulate around your genitals. It looks like crumbly cheese and usually has a foul odor. The best way to prevent and treat smegma is to regularly wash your genitals and the surrounding areas with soap and clean water." The myth of the unclean female parts and the very clean and almost appetizing male parts is just that: A MYTH!

 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discharge 

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/pervert-who-snuck-up-behind-34312448 

 

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/24281-smegma 

 

Wikipedia

Victim of Kidnapping

 

 

Jayme Closs was a pretty, 13 years old girl who was kidnapped by 21 years old Jake Patterson after he killed her parents. It took him three attempts before he got hold of the young girl, and she was held captive for 88 days, most of the time stuck under his bed. Not many expected her to be alive after that many days of captivity, but she did survive and even succeeded in escaping on her own and getting help by a neighbor. 

Patterson was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences, but the best part of this sad murder and kidnapping event is that Jayme found the strength to work for the help and rights of exploited children. As to the kidnapping she seems to have gained a certain strength in the knowledge that she outsmarted her abductor, and not only escaped, but also saw him get jailed.

Jake Patterson ruined his life by this criminal offence and one wonders what went into his head to plan a kidnapping of a girl whom he didn't even know. Did he dream of a love story of her falling in love with him, no matter what? If so, then he is a victim of another art than Jayme: He fell for a not all that uncommon male myth that ought to get debunked as soon as possible ....

 

https://morbidology.com/the-last-ride-michele-melander/ 

 

https://www.wbay.com/2024/01/11/this-week-marks-five-years-since-jayme-closs-was-found-alive-after-kidnapping/ 

 

https://www.wbay.com/content/news/Wisconsin-man-convicted-in-Jayme-Closs-case-moved-out-of-state-512789791.html 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/14/us/jayme-closs-updates-jake-patterson.html

 

Wikipedia

 

Poverty of Women, the Victorian Way

 

I've seen this photo many times, and I know that it also has made a deep impact on many others. When I saw it the first time I assumed that this poor, starving, physically and socially down-trodden woman was a former servant of a wealthy lady. The reason for that assumption was her dress: It looks like a silk dress that the woman may have had - or stolen - from her rich employer. I thought that the child might be hers, maybe after being raped or seduced by the master of the house, the husband of her employer. Actually, the picture gave me an idea of her life story that was a fantasy over the social circumstances of poor women at this time.

However, I found out that others knew - or fantasized - about it, and this fantasy (?) looks interesting to me: "This shocking image of a woman, probably in her 50s, known as a crawler was widely reproduced. It is taken on the steps of the workhouse on Short’s Gardens. Adolphe Smith says the woman earnt bread and a cup of tea by looking after the baby while the mother went to work. She was known as a crawler as these people were homeless and would ‘crawl’ from one area to another, sleeping outdoors or in casual wards."

Homelessness at its worst? No, I think it may have gotten much worse in other parts of the world, like e.g. USA.

https://mylearning.org/stories/streets-of-london-1870-1900/1246

 

Passion For A Shadow

I read this on Reddit: "My neighbor is 75 and a stubborn Appalachian woman. She does not listen to reason. She has alienated her whole family and they won't even speak to her now because of this romance scam. She has fallen for at least 6 fake Johnny Depps."

6 fake Johnnys?!!!!! That sure is true dedication to an idol who doesn't even know her and her passionate obsession with him!!!!!!

And the Reddit-tale goes on: "She is making adult videos for this man and is probably afraid that if she stops giving money, this weird man will leak her adult entertainment videos. She told me she put dildos in her body for this man. She also insists that Johnny loves her because she has been a fan since the 80s and wrote him fan letters back then too."

The Johnny Depp of the 80s isn't what he is now in the 2024-2025. A lot has happened since then and not all of it something that adds to his image in a flattering manner. I wonder how the 75 years old woman feels about that, but I suspect that she may be fluttering on a special part of "Cloud Nine" that's set up for those who simply refuse to see the realities their dreams are up against.

This imaginary "love affair" made me think of the general tragedy of falling in love with a shadow. Many years ago I had a gay friend (sadly enough now passed because of too heavy drinking) who was so very much in love with Johnny Depp. However, he didn't think of dating him because he wasn't up on that devious Cloud Nine that has its own way of luring people on into a jungle of false hopes. He just "swooned" happily at the sight of Johnny's beautiful eyes and his - at that time - boyish charm, which I hope gave him some kind of pleasure.  

As to the lady at Reddit then she may be more versatile than just sticking with one: "She also is dating William Shatner somehow." Well, good for her (I hope!!!!) ....

 

This article is a chapter from my recently published ebook with Amazon: “Titbits”

 

“From Toyboy To Playboy?”

More men than than most of us may assume fulfill either one of these categories. Some even fulfill both of them although the categories as such are ideological opposites: A ”toyboy” is supposed to be the sexual plaything of a powerful, elderly woman whereas the classic ”playboy” is a grown man consuming younger, attractive women as sex objects in a ”use them and leave them”-manner. That’s the reason why the general signal values of a ”toyboy” versus a ”playboy” stand for opposite dispositions and behaviors.

However, some individuals jump category over time like in the case of e.g. the Muslim prophet Muhammad. When he was in his early twenties he started out as the toyboy of the clever and very successful merchant Khadijah, who was in her forties and who had been widowed two or three times before she laid eyes on young Muhammad.

Over time he changed from toyboy to playboy when he turned into a sexual consumer of very young women like e.g. Aishah who became his third wife when she was just 6 years old.

It should be noted that just like the clever merchant Khadijah she too played an important part in the success of Muhammad’s teachings. This is a fact that has been overshadowed by the shock of the Western World at getting to know about the consummation of their marriage when she was just 9.

Without Khadijah there wouldn’t be any Islam today as she was instrumental in the very saving of and later propagation of Muhammad’s early teachings which are supposed to have been canalized by the angel Gabriel. As to the grown-up Aisha then she has been portrayed as a scholar, very well-versed in many important topics of the day as well as in the teachings of Islam. 

Cybele

However, long before there even was a Muhammad there were toyboys who stayed that way as nothing about them suggested that they turned into playboys. That said, one shouldn’t forget that toyboys might gain power over those they serve, as for instance one of the Mother Goddesses who were worshipped ages before Yahweh or Allah stepped onto the religious scenery. One of these numerous mother goddesses was Cybele who had a priesthood of eunuchs, i.e. her toyboys: Part of their serving her was self-castration.

Her beloved Attis, who seems to have fulfilled a double role as both her (abandoned) son and her shepherd lover also had castrated himself in order to serve her.

That means that to become a toyboy of an ancient mother goddess like e.g. Cybele you might have to cut off what might impregnate her. That wasn’t the case with ALL mother goddesses, but it was with her, and it sure is an interesting as well as quite thought-provoking historic fact ….

https://www.ajwa.london/product/khadijah-the-story-of-islams-first-lady/

  

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Aisha

 

https://answering-islam.org/Responses/Menj/zaynab.htm

 

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-herkimer-worldreligions/chapter/the-prophet-muhammad/

 

https://www.theoi.com/Phrygios/Kybele.html

 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/Playboy

 

Wikipedia

The CLAIM of Holiness

 

The Bible is supposed to be the holiest of anything holy with Christians. However, there are some grave problems with a book that is a patchwork of scriptures, written several hundred years after the eyewitnesses were part of the events. Also, it's a problem that it doesn't contain all the scriptures, as some were deemed "wrong" or "non-acceptable". Others weren't found until later, but one may assume that since they haven't been included when that happened they have been deemed "wrong" too. Strange? No, not really as The Bible has been turned into a useful tool for those in power, and why risk the usefulness by changing the tool? 

People have loved the old myths and legends for centuries, and some even still believe in them, no matter how crazy they are: They are the glue that keeps the Christian faith alive to some people.

The main difference between The Bible and The Koran is the claim that where one is a patchwork, the other isn't: The notion of holiness moves several nooks upwards when one claims that this book is the exact dictation by Allah through the angel Gabriel, and not a patchwork of scripts by people who weren't even eyewitnesses to e.g. the Crucifixion. By being represented as a dictation all of it becomes "The words of God": That sure is a claim that beats heaps of Christian claims!!!

The Bible is sneaky when it comes to its use as a political tool, because it's built on old myths and legends that can't be verified. The Koran, on the other hand, is like a sledge hammer as it's proposed to be the indisputable truth. Muhammad didn't have any witnesses to his talks with Gabriel so everything depends on his name as a prophet: Do we believe him, or don't we believe him? Christians don't accept him as a true prophet, and atheists or agnostics don't believe either of these worldwide faith systems, but they recognize the political use that has been made of them.

 

Breed Into POWER?

 

I often see statements, or just comments, from Muslims living in Western countries, where they were not born, now claiming that they will take over in a few years time by excessive breeding. Not being able to see any advantages or gains to the human race - especially women - on this planet from Islam that's a nigthmarish thought. However, it seems to be true that the number of Muslims in Europe has been growing steadily for quite some time. For instance the time period of mid-2010 to mid-2016 saw a rise of 1% point, namely from 3.8% to 4.9%: A population of 19.5 million grew to 25.8 million.

Islam seems to be the the fastest-growing religion in Europe. According to the Pew Research Center, the European, Muslim population (excluding Turkey) was 30 million in 1990, and 44 million in 2010. How come? Well, as we are well aware Europe has experienced a record influx of asylum seekers from e.g. Syria. However, Muslims of today harbor a belief in the "breeding into power-myth" that may play a role: They are proud of having a higher fertility than other Europeans which they see as the key to gain power in various European countries. Having refugee status allow them, and their families, to stay in Europe, breeding and claiming respect of their religion. Recently some of them have been clamoring for Sharia - or even a Caliphate - in their new, European countries.

The countries that have had this massive immigration by Muslims find that the Islamic newcomers have a lot of very young people of the child bearing age. When people start living longer, they tend to have fewer children, and it doesn't seem unlikely that Islamic populations will start shrinking. Some say this may happen around 2050, but it goes without saying that if breeding has its political perspective and is seen as a way to gain power then that prophecy will not be fulfilled.  
Right now (namely 2022) the global birth rate is 2.4 births per woman with a Muslim birthrate of 2.9. 

Jerusalem 1938

As Islam isn't only a religion, but an obligation to spread the word - and the policy - worldwide I think more and more refugees from The Middle East will find that the welcoming doors of Europe will be closed to them. As they clamor for Caliphates and Sharia, the population of the countries they have swarmed is getting more and more vocal in their protests against more Muslim immigrants. Islamization in Europe may inevitably lead to uproar.

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-8-2017-006320_EN.html

 

 

RelatedWhy is the religion of Islam spreading rapidly throughout the world? 

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/03/us/report-sees-religions-growing-and-shifting-in-next-few-decades.html 

 

 

Wikipedia