lørdag den 1. november 2025

Battling The Penis

 


In the early 1900s, women were expected to be obedient, loyal and self-sacrificing wives to their husbands, and to their fathers or brothers before marriage. Most of them complied, probably even finding some kind of relief in taking on traditional female roles. However, some rebelled against societal norms, demanding respect from the men in their lives - or maybe even freedom from what can only be labelled as male suppression. As it is, the main symbol of male power in a Patriarchy is the male member: The penis, which in a weird-looking, but not quite illogical manner, may even attain the status of a "rival" = "He loves his penis more than he loves me" or "he uses it as a weapon against me". That's why the penis has been targeted by women out for revenge, like in the 1990s when Lorena Bobbitt made headlines by severing her sleeping husband's penis with a kitchen knife. Luckily for John Bobbitt his penis was saved by surgery, and to prove that he "still was a true man" with a functional penis, he appeared in two pornographic films. 

Now, WHY would Lorena do something like that to her sleeping husband? Well, she alleged that he had raped and abused her i so many ways for years, and that now she had had enough. After being aquitted by "reason of insanity" Lorena started a foundation for domestic abuse victims and their children. In 1995 she divorced John - or he divorced her, I'm not sure of which, but divorced they were ....

 

However, long before Lorena Bobbitt made headlines another woman, Bertha Boronda, sliced off her husband's penis, and this time there was no saving it by surgery. It was lost once and for all, and she served five years in jail because she was fed up by having to put up with her husband's infidelity, lies, etc.. It seems that he spent time in a nearby brothel, which she didn't accept. That's why she attacked his member with a razor, which made him wake up and escape his infuriated wife. I take for granted that that was the end of the marriage ....

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/30/arts/television/lorena-bobbitt-documentary-jordan-peele.html 

 

Wikipedia 

onsdag den 29. oktober 2025

Was Queen Elizabeth I A MAN????????

 

Elizabeth I (1533–1603) in all her feminine finery

Well, her father, King Henry VIII, turned into a human OGRE - at least in my opinion - and her mother, Anne Boleyn, is reputed to have become a well-traveled ghost after being beheaded by her husband, who was desperate to have a son that might save his Tudor-dynasty. I agree that such a heritage might lead up to something very weird in anyone, man or woman, but first and foremost in those who don't like the strength and capacity in a female ruler like this particular English queen. 

The portraits of Elizabeth I doesn't suggest anything masculine in her looks, although she did "rule like a man". Nevertheless, the so-called "Bisley Boy"-legend gained interest, but not in her lifetime. No, it took several hundred years for this idea of an intricate conspiracy to dawn upon the misogynistic population, and the one who really set it going was the author who created "Dracula", Bram Stoker. He claimed that the real princess Elizabeth died at an early age, and that she was replaced by a boy at Bisley because the nanny of the young princess feared the wrath of the king when he found out. According to Stoker, that was the reason why Elizabeth I never married, as the intimacy of a marriage would have revealed her true gender.


However, during her lifetime, she was examined by several doctors, and none of them spoke of something "masculine" in her biology. Also, one of her suitors, The Duke of Anjou or King Philip II of Spain, bribed her laundress to let him know whether she menstruated or not. The laundress reported that she did, thus confirming her female biology. That may be a great disappointment to some misogynistic people of 2025, but that's something they will have to get over.

 

https://justhistoryposts.com/2022/11/28/a-brief-moment-of-history-was-queen-elizabeth-i-secretly-a-man/ 

 

Wikipedia

 

tirsdag den 28. oktober 2025

Ivana And Her Mysterious Death

 

Ivana and Donald Trump

Presumably the playboy-businessman, Donald J. Trump, was infatuated with the young Czech, Ivana Marie Zelnickova (1949-2022), who became his first wife in 1977 and the mother of his three eldest children, Don Jr., Ivanka and Eric. She had succeeded in leaving Czechoslovakia by marrying her platonic friend, the Austrian ski instructor Alfred Winklmayr in 1971, and moving to Canada she became a model as well as a ski instructor. In 1972 she attended Charles University in Prague and earned a master's degree in physical education. Actually, it seems that she was a dedicated career woman. She was always busy with her many projects which was one of the claims of Donald Trump in the interview with Martha Stewart when he was set to leave her for Marla Maples: She came out a genuine career woman, and apparently, he didn't like being married to someone like that. 

However, after marrying Donald Trump Ivana had become so much more than a model and a ski instructor: A businesswoman, the author of several books, including her autobiography, "Raising Trump", and she came to hold important key positions in the Trump Organization, becoming CEO and president of Trump's Castle casino resort, and manager of the Plaza Hotel. All of which she seems to have been good at, most likely even better than her husband.

The Trump-couple was very prominent in New York in the 1980s, but they were divorced in 1990, and he married his mistress, Marla Maples, who was the mother of his daughter, Tiffany. As to Ivana, then she too married again, namely four times in all: 1) Alfred Winkelmayr, 2) Donald Trump, 3) The Italian businessman, Riccardo Mazzucchelli, and 4) Rossano Rubicondi

Ivana and Rossano Rubicondi

She doesn't appear to me to lead a tragic or frustrated life as she did what she may have liked the most: Sprouting ideas for new enterprises, like e.g. developing her own lines of clothing, fashion jewelry, and beauty products as well as publishing several books. Also, she wrote an advice column for Globe called "Ask Ivana" from 1995 through 2010. Several rumors about her alleged close friendship with Ghislaine Maxwell have suggested that she took part in certain Epstein-activities, but how are we to know that they are 100% true? We don't ....

If Maria Farmer was witnessing something like that, it indicates much more sinister pastimes than having fun as a socialite and a successful businesswoman. Should it not be true, then it's slander.

Something else that may be slander is the allegations by Michael Wolff that Trump asked his good friend Epstein for advice on how to get rid of Ivana, especially about "pushing her down the stairs". As she eventually (allegedly) died from a fall on her stairs it's difficult not to take such an allegation into account, but only up to a point: The timeline doesn't fit the birth of Tiffany Trump on October 13, 1993, which was the presumed reason why Trump wanted to get rid of her so that he might marry Marla Maples. However, when Ivana died from her fatal - and freaky - accident on her stairs it happened a few days before she was to testify in one of the many major investigations against the Trump business, something which led to many suspicions, even today. On July 14, 2022, Ivana died at age 73 of blunt impact injuries to the torso after falling down steep spiraling stairs at her home. Was she pushed or did she stumble? That's up to all kinds of guesses, as there wasn't any thorough investigation. Something else that gives rise to suspicions of all kinds is the fact that she ended up in a deplorable grave on the golf course of her former husband, Donald Trump, "it shielded his beloved golf course from taxes, by virtue of it being a cemetery".


To me, this looks like some kind of revenge. Could it be because she told about his raping and mistreating her? Well, that's anybody's guess .... 

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/deposition-trump-2-children-delayed-134548855.html 

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/ive-seen-epsteins-photos-of-trump-with-topless-girls-author/ 

 

https://www.brainyquote.com/lists/authors/top-10-ivana-trump-quotes 

 

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD006-U6.pdf 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/15/ivana-trump-donald-trump-wife-death-cause 

 

https://youtube.com/shorts/NJyjYWPo4QI?si=hm3zdDpUTzhieqeM 

 

https://www.reddit.com/user/SiteTall/comments/1nv5yra/michael_wolff_says_trump_talked_to_epstein_about/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button 

 

Wikipedia

 

lørdag den 25. oktober 2025

The Gendered BUTT-Game

 

Looking at a picture of an elderly woman staring at a handsome and scantily dressed young man, many would ask: WHAT IS SHE DOING THERE????? Well, that’s a really silly question because to me that's obvious: She is admirering a well-formed male butt, maybe even dreaming of undressing it - and why not? If I was asked that question I would say, because it breaks up the gender-game of "each to his/her role", and she, being an elderly woman, is still not supposed to feel that way. However, surprise, surprise, women have sexual drives too, which also goes for this woman even though she may be too elderly to be considered "beautiful" by men.

In a Patriarchal society something like this will be seen as "natural", and if such a situation raises some eyebrows that will be all. Most will see it as some kind of funny "joke" on the "Men will be men"-theme. Age does slow down certain abilities in the male sex, whereas it often will work the opposite way with women. Being of an age when women were raised to believe that their status was built on male notions of their beauty and biological usefulness, one may argue that this not-so-young woman actually (re-)gains her individual personality through her desire. 

One more surprise: Women may use false eyelashes, get surgical alterations of feminine parts of their body, and, to their surprise and disappointment, men don't fall for any of it. But lo and behold, neither do many/most women go for fake muscle-push-up-Tarzans who are so deep into e.g. body building that they in reality are not able to fall in love with anyone but themselves. Who would most often win the seduction-game, Einstein or Tarzan? Well, not so pretty Albert did prove that women fell for him:

 

onsdag den 22. oktober 2025

Murdered By Cow-Licks


Well, some kinds of love may be LETHAL ....
 
Some murders read more like a joke than anything else, but this one is really, really weird. Actually, it's so very weird that one wonders whether it's true or not that a man was murdered by his wife in a most unusual manner in 1902: She salted him by putting salt on his hands, feet, etc. when he was very drunk. When she was done, she took him out to the meadow where their cattle were. Cows being cows, they went crazy over the salted human, and presumably licked him to death, which, of course, was what his wife was after .... 

Why would she do anything like that? Well, Mr. Foley had beaten her up as well as mistreated her in various ways, which is never a good idea as some women are reputed to be very vindictive as well as quite devious .... 

 

tirsdag den 21. oktober 2025

No Peace For Beheaded Queen Anne Boleyn?

 

Yes, Anne Boleyn (ca. 1501-1536) did become the Queen of England (1533-1536), but as we know, she didn't STAY queen as she was jailed and beheaded for a variety of not very likely "crimes". 

Sitting in Tower, she must have felt abandoned and let down by her husband, Henry VIII. She may have found some solace in the love and comfort she had from her loyal ladies-in-waiting, but it didn't save her from the expert executioner, her husband had brought over to rid himself of this woman whom he had adored for years, but whom he now found burdensome.

When her head fell, her ladies-in-waiting swept it in a cloth of some sort, but then it disappeared with the rest of her dead body. There have been many suggestions as to where she was buried, but no certainty: Where is her dead body, and could it be because it has sort of disappeared that she seems to have been robbed not only of her life, but of her "eternal rest"??? As it is, after death, she has turned into a very famous ghost, roaming some of the places that were of special value to her when she was alive. One of these is Blickling Hall where she was born. It has been said that her spirit may be expected to appear on May 19th, the anniversary of her execution. Some give very vivid and dramatic accounts of how her ghost comes in a carriage drawn by headless horses and driven by a headless coachman. As it that wasn't enough, people also say that her ghost is carrying her own severed head!

No, this is not supposed to be Anne, but it might have been as she has been called the "most widely travelled ghost": She simply has a way of appearing everywhere, even in modern vehicles, like e.g. trains. Very weird indeed, but it indicates an ongoing interest - and maybe even love? - of the poor, beheaded queen by the English population, that is very telling. She wasn't a typical "English rose", but her fate was touching, and people feel for her.


https://ghostcitytours.com/ghost-stories/christmas-ghosts/ghost-anne-boleyn/

 

https://www.hauntedrooms.co.uk/anne-boleyn-ghost-sightings-pictures 

 

Wikipedia 

 

mandag den 20. oktober 2025

The Missionary Who Was Converted Into Atheism


The evolution of religion, i.e. the concept of God, is very interesting as it tells us something about the development of society. However, it's much more intricate than just stating what seems to be the general rule: God started out as female, but had a kind of sex-transformation with the new Patriarchal pattern that was instituted when farming became the "normal way to live". This goddess was the Supreme Deity and she covered all aspects of life, although she often is described as a god of fruition. To really dig deep into this area of history and ideologies would take some serious precautions as it's obvious that science sees these early deities through the tainted glasses of Patriarchy, thus misrepresenting an important ideological development.

The Abrahamic religions find status and authority in what is considered genuine messages from "God" in writing, like e.g. The Bible: Yahweh - who started out as one of the "toyboys" of the supreme God, namely the goddess Asherah - ended up claiming to be the only true deity of the entire world. One may feel about that as one chose to, but no matter what, it's obvious that this belief has not been without its implications. However, I agree with Napoleon when he stated the importance of keeping the religion of the then post-Revolution-society survive because it stabilized the social institutions, like e.g. the class system of "rich" and "poor". 


That should turn religion into the main gluing system in any society, and one must admit that it seems to play an important role in most societies - and for the same reason: It's the what keeps it all together. That said it becomes even more interesting to learn that there actually are a few societies in which religions - namely institutionalized faith systems - are of no interest whatsoever. Religious systems are seen as superstition and that makes it quite difficult for Western missionairies to do what they came for when visiting these societies. Actually, it may be impossible, and the missonairies could end up as Atheists like e.g. Daniel Everett, who went to the Piraha-tribe in the Amazonas to study and convert them.

To me it seems that he had a rather naive idea of the power of The Biblical scriptures: He thought that "The Bible should be able to speak for itself. So my daily activities among the Pirahãs were mainly linguistic, trying to figure out the language well enough to do a good translation of the New Testament." Also, he "would often talk to people about my faith and why it was important to me". The Pirahas must have been very polite as well as gentle people not to walk out on him, but he ended up realizing that he was toiling in vain as a missionary when one of the men said to him: "The Pirahãs know that you left your family and your own land to come here and live with us. We know that you do this to tell us about Jesus. You want us to live like Americans. But the Pirahãs do not want to live like Americans. We like to drink. We like more than one woman. We don’t want Jesus. But we like you. You can stay with us. But we don’t want to hear any more about Jesus. OK?" Then, referring to the previous American missionaries among them, he added, “Arlo told us about Jesus. Steve told us about Jesus. But we don’t want Jesus.” The other men present seemed to agree with him."

Little by little Daniel Everett came to question his own faith, and if he isn't a fullfledged Atheist by now, he sure is bordering on this modern kind of religious disbelief .... 

Or as he put it himself: "All the doctrines and faith I had held dear were a glaring irrelevancy in this culture. They were superstition to the Pirahãs. And they began to seem more and more like superstition to me."

 

https://www.bentley.edu/news/9-fascinating-facts-about-dan-everett 

 

Wikipedia