Lost in Togetherness
Starry -Eyed, walking together
Hand in hand
I hold you, and you hold me
Somehow, still quite lost
All Rights Reserved © EC
Lost in Togetherness
Starry -Eyed, walking together
Hand in hand
I hold you, and you hold me
Somehow, still quite lost
All Rights Reserved © EC
The predictions of The End of the World are numerous, and as people have been told this over and over without the world actually ending, it's BS and nothing but that. Saying that, I'm fully aware that if I haven't forgotten the prediction for this year at that time, I shall wake up on the predicted date of November 13, (which very fittingly is a Friday), feeling just a tiny bit worried. Silly, but that's the way it is, just like when one has read a public astrology column, telling about riches beyond one's imagination coming one's way on a specific day or time period: One doesn't believe it shall happen, but then still, it might. Because of some very common psychological mechanisms that will be the special day, one buys a lottery ticket, at the same time fully aware that it most likely is money down the drain.
I agree, but I don't find it very plausible that should we not be alone, then it will be some of those supposed "Aliens" out there, somwhere in Space, who shall kill us off and lay our planet bare. That's something humans may do to the population of foreign planets, just like we did to other people and cultures on our own planet. To take for granted that aliens from another planet are out to kill us in a "swatting flies"-manner signals a special paranoia, which was born out of our own cruel actions on Earth in the past. Or put another way: They may or they may not, but as they haven't done it yet, why assume that they will? Besides, our idea of those aliens being wonder-creatures of intelligence may be put to shame. Maybe we, in reality, are the most intelligent creatures of the universe although we constantly prove that in some respects we are downright stupid, going on kicking our own butt, so to speak.
I find it very interesting that all the big religions seem to have notions of a religious figure which Christians call "The Antichrist". They are not the same, but they resemble each other. All of them are connected to an idea of "The End of the World" as moving from something totay defiled and sinful to its opposite: After the ultimate badness comes the true, pure happiness. In Christianity Jesus comes back in "The Rapture", the evil Antichrist is killed and his spell upon humans is put to an end. Because of that detail I truly understand why so many see tRump as The Antichrist. In my opinion he is evilness incarnate, so why not give him the title of Antichrist, which he deserves, although he didn't exactly covet it?
As we know there have been many non-fulfilled "End-Days" up through history, so this new one is just one in many. One of the interesting things about it is, that it's predicted to be 10 days after The Midterms in the USA. It would have been even more interesting had it been on the date: November 3. That would have been positively uncanny ....
https://www.popsci.com/science/world-end-overpopulation-doomsday-november-2026/?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dates_predicted_for_apocalyptic_events
https://www.mythic-harmonies.com/norse-mythology/ragnarok-norse-mythology-end-of-the-world/
https://www.watchmojo.com/articles/end-of-the-world-according-to-science-and-religion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_the_World_(Skeeter_Davis_song)
Or let's not? After all, it may be a bit more difficult than you imagined it to be. Robbers, murderers, kidnappers, hackers or whatever may take for granted that their crimes just depend on their decision to commit them to succeed. As we - the grown-ups of this world - know, that's not how it works. Not even planning will guarantee the outcome of any kind of actions. Actually, that may be what ruins everything when one part of the magic blend of instant success is lacking: Luck. Yes, I'm a great believer in luck, and the reason for that is, that I've had the experience of being out of luck for several time periods of my life. Something which was not very pleasant, but anyway, it made me think about the phenomenon of luck, what it is, and how one attains and (preferably) learns how to keep it.
Lady luck didn't side with me, so by now my poor, wounded computer will be out of circulation. Luckily for me, I do have substitutes, but it still feels like a slap in the face, because it's connected with the first feeling at finding the service which was that of luck. Had I not felt lucky, it wouldn't have hit that hard, which is a fact I shall have to ponder a little bit until I (hopefully) come to terms with it.
The Playmates of Epstein were not the pre-puberty girls he trafficked, but the grown-up "boys" he shared his interests with, and who wanted a "piece of the cake, he had to offer". As we know, those "boys" were golden ones from the international "Elite", who owed their fame and status to their wealth, family connections and general influence. Because what these criminals did in their informal "club of abuse", their ill-begotten fame has often overshadowed that of the victims. However, these women have formed their own well-known group, and are out for justice. Their prime target is undoubtedly tRump, who had all kinds of ties with Epstein, and whom I suspect was a colleague of his or maybe even a co-worker. The meeting of Epstein-victims with tRump's appointed legal kingpin, Pam Bondi, came to nothing, which might have been expected from her past as a Florida AG when the Epstein-trafficking was in full bloom. To send her is like chosing the wolf to protect lambs, and it was obvious from the very beginning that she had no intention to do anything about the claims of the victims: They were let down once again.
However, among the many more or less unsubstantiated rumors about Epstein, there has been some suggesting that he wasn't the top-guy of the criminal organisation of trafficking, that he ran. Or put another way, he was only the puppet of someone even more vile, and also more influential. True/False? Well, he himself hasn't spoken of someone being his "boss", but a house servant of some kind said that he had one, namely his associate and, for a time period, lover, Ghislaine Maxwell.
That claim may be in for investigation, but it's not substantiated by other witnesses. There is no doubt about Ghislaine Maxwell's taking part in his crimes, but it takes much more to be the main culprit or the disguised and secret "boss of the boss". Her alleged close friendship with the first wife of tRump, Ivana, ties her to that more than shady couple, and it's anybody's guess that all of them were work mates.I believe in the possibility of something like that, and several names pop up in my mind, but not the proven identity of the one, this man might be referring to. WHO was he/she if he/she is more than the figment of his imagination?
Karen Margaret Greenlee (born 1958)
"Have sex with" doesn't quite cover the meaning of what she did, because being dead her rape victims - and rape it was - really didn't have any kind of say in what happened to them. She, being alive, was 100% in command which may very likely be what turned her on. I, for one, think it's the ability to decide what's going to happen - or nor happen - that's the what these people desire the most.

In time there have been many rumors of dead women being raped by males in all kinds of service jobs. The jobs in focus are the ones which are connected with hospitals or cemetaries, but this is the first case I've seen with a female culprit - and culprit she is.
