Camille Claudel, Sculptor, Muse And Mistress

 

This young woman doesn't look happy, but when one sees her soulful and beautiful face it speaks volumes both of an interesting personality as well as a difficult life: Camille Claudel (1864-1943). As so many other talented women she dreamed of giving vent to her artistic visions, although her mother found her ambitions of becoming a sculptor very unladylike and tried to curb them. However, Camille had her way and she went to Paris to study at The Academie Colarossi which not only allowed female students, but also gave them the opportunity to work with nude, male models. (At that time Ecole des Beaux-Arts barred women from enrolling to study). Alfred Boucher became her mentor and friend for three years, and he was the one who introduced her to the famous sculptor Augusta Rodin in 1883. Much to her mother's chagrin the 18 years old Camille not only became his muse, but also his mistress. This relationship gave her access to the artistic circles of Paris, but it was seen as scandalous, not least by her family.

                                             August Rodin, c. 1875–80

It's well-known that many of Rodin's works were made in collaboration with Camille, but typically for that time, Rodin received the honors. Camille wasn't recognized as the artist she was, and she also had to share her famous lover with another woman, the mother of his son. In 1898 she suffered a miscarriage and broke off her sexual relationship with him. At the same time she seems to have developed some kind of psychological problems, smashing some of her works, withdrawing from society now and then which gave her mother the opportunity to have her locked up in a mental asylum for the rest of her life.

Another reason for her changed attitude may have been that Rodin, who had been of help to her, started to oppose some of her ideas and see to it that she didn't get the opportunities she deserved. That didn't condemn her to an eternal obscurity: In 2017 she was sort of being "re-discovered", and today her works are exhibited in several famous museum. Also she now has her own museum, southeast of Paris: Musée Camille Claudel which holds approximately half of her artworks.

 

Camille Claudel in her studio with a plaster model of "Perseus and the Gorgon"

 

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/a-woman-of-genius/

 

https://www.christies.com/en/stories/camille-claudel-collecting-guide-6102000635104cbe88a705f65fdf8288 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Claudel 

 

 

WARNING: Facebook is attempting ID-thefts

This Facebook-message in Danish, which I received this morning, reads as follows: "Prove your identity using a videoselfie: In order to make sure that you are a real individual you need to make a videoselfie. We want you to move your head during this process to help us in shooting your face from various angles."

WOW, this very first message of the day really set my soul aflame after being told that I had been kicked out of Facebook: THANK YOU, Mr. Zuckerberg, I SEE THAT KIND OF EFFORTS AS A GENUINE RECOMMENDATION OF EVERYTHING I STAND FOR!!!!!! 

Well, but HOW did our ongoing fight over my Facebook-postings being "proper" or not end up in something like this? I think it started out with my not liking the 45th president of USA, whom I always refer to as Don the Con (or even worse), but I can't be sure, and it may be something else that turned the focus on me and my postings, even called some of them "pornographic" (which they are not!!!). One of these assumedly pornographic postings goes back 10-12 years and Facebook has been harping about it for a long time: It's the photo of teenage-girls and one of them is "mooning" the photographer/onlooker. I see that as a joke, but the Facebook-"police" see it as child pornography. It goes without saying that had it been anything close to child-pornography I wouldn't have brought it as I'm against exploiting other people, young or not. However, photos like that one sent me to Facebook jail over and over.

After being kicked out (they called it something else) by Facebook they offered me a sort of comeback by starting a new profile. To me that looked silly, but I decided to se what happened if I tried to do so. 

Everything seemed to be going smoothly, but then I was asked to give them my "videoselfie". THAT was a full stop for me as I know that they, actually right now, are harvesting the comments, sayings, etc. by the members for the developing of their (more or less illicit) AI-programs. However, I my face or my words, are not for that kind of exploitation by Mark Elliot Zuckerberg.  

By the way, during the process of starting a new profile I was asked about the date of my birthday, and I chose to give them a random age. Why? Because, these days, a birthday-date may be the first step in attaining access, etc. to the most private parts of someone's privacy ....

As they always stress their concern about privacy issues and the importance of not exploiting them I'm quite flabbergasted at their reading - and sampling??? - private conversations on Messenger. Looks weird, looks illicit or "out of character for what they propose to be"??? Yup, and still it's true as I can prove by this screenshot of their comment to one of my private Messenger-conversations:

The framed part reads as follows: "You can't post messages for 3 days. Something you wrote in a chat goes against our rules." 

As will be known Facebook is working on developing some of those, before-mentioned, AI-constructions and that's what they use as an excuse of several kinds of transgressions, like e.g. the "burglary" of Messenger. They are not the only ones who are working on something like that, but that's no excuse as people come to the platform for some innocent fun, not to be exploited by something that looks more and more like an attempted ID-theft. Actually, they seem to suffer from some delusions about "ownership", but the users of Facebook are NOT "owned" by anybody but themselves.

 

https://www.meta.com/da-dk/help/quest/articles/accounts/account-settings-and-management/delete-meta-account/

 

Noyb - Google-søgning 

 

https://headshottr.com/ 

Star Gazer and X-ray Woman

 

Sarah Frances Whiting (1847-1927) was a true pioneer in astronomy, and her work stands today, as she was one of the founders as well as the first director of the observatory at Wellesley College. She made a career before that was considered proper for women.

Actually, Sarah Frances Whiting was the first one to establish a program of astronomy in laboratory instruction for women in the United States. However, she also delved into another - and then quite new - field of science: X-rays. She started out only a few weeks after Wilhelm Röntgen annonced the discovery of this kind of rays which to me is a proof that she was of a genuine scientific mind, ready to study something that not many have done before. That turns her into a "double pioneer": A physicist, which she was, as well as an astronomer, which she also was. 

In her long career she introduced many women to physics and astronomy even though both these fields of science were almost entirely associated with men at the time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Fr

 

https://pubs.aip.org/aapt/ajp/article/91/6/417/2891436/Sarah-Frances-Whiting-pioneer-of-laboratory 

 

https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1927PA.....35..539C 

 

 

Was Einstein A Science-Thief????

Albert Einstein was a gifted man

For ages Albert Einstein was considered the smartest man on Earth. According to legend he himself pointed at Nikola Tesla as someone who deserved that acclaim more than he did. However, if he did, there may be another reason for his declining the honorable appellation of a genius: He may have stolen some scientific works from other scientists. As is well-known he battened on the works of his first wife, the Serbian physicist and mathematician, Mileva Maric. Actually, she seems to have registered most of her works in his name because he convinced her that she, being a woman, would be met by prejudices that wouldn't allow her to publish it in her own name. Also he told her that her gender would make both her and her work unnoticed or even rejected as science.

 

Mileva Maric was the first wife of Albert Einstein

The allegations that he stole the Theory of Relativity from  his brilliant wife, Mileva Maric, stems from Abram Fedorovich Joffe who saw the original manuscript, "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Korper", and then it was signed with both names. However, later on the name of Mileva Maric was left out when the work was published.

 

Albert and Elsa Einstein in Japan

One shouldn't forget that Albert Einstein also collaborated with fellow scientists Jurgen Rehn and Michel Jansis in forming parts of the Theory of Relativity, but somehow "forgot" their contribution after it was made famous. After the murder of his friend, the Egyptian scientist Mustafa Mosharafa, he may have stolen his science. 

Albert Einstein and The Einstein puppet

After his first marriage to the brilliant and also wealthy mathematician, Mileva Maric, he married his first cousin, Elsa, who had no scientific ambitions. Actually, it has been said about her that she could hardly read, but was very good at gate-keeping against all the bothersome fans of this alleged "smartest man on the planet", Albert Eintein.

https://www.techcounsellor.com/2017/04/albert-einstein-plagiarist-century/ 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/08/01/did-albert-einstein-steal-the-theory-of-relativity-from-his-wife/ 

 

https://vixra.org/pdf/1306.0167v1.pdf 

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/guest-blog/the-forgotten-life-of-einsteins-first-wife/ 

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/08/01/did-albert-einstein-steal-the-theory-of-relativity-from-his-wife/ 

 

Wikipedia

 

The Unexpected Lodger

Day-Kisses

 

The kisses of the day lack darkness

Nights turn kisses into loving arrows

the bow is still vibrant from the shot

Was this what I wanted, this passion?

How am I to know?

The passion didn't ask leave, it just moved in

there it was, all alive

an unexpected lodger in the house called me

 

©Else Cederborg

 

 

Publishing With Hybrid Publishing Companies

So even Tarzan wants to publish a book? Well, everybody - or nearly everybody - is writing and writing or dreaming of doing just that. Some even have high hopes of turning their writings into a new career, but that part of their dreams may prove more difficult than they imagined, even for good authors. A truth that's not even news as it always has been that way, just think of e.g. Jane Austin and Mary Shelley who had to pay their way into the business and who didn't make much money out of it even though they wrote what has become classics.

Mary Shelley

These day one of the roads toward the status of "published writer" is what is called "the hybrid press". It's my impression that many authors who believe in their art are willing to pay some of the costs of publishing although that system seems to belong to an earlier time period. Modern times ideal has been the traditional publishing, and that's what the hybrid publishing resembles, but isn't. Traditional publishers live by the SALE of books which is what gives them their revenue, but the hybrids live by the authors paying them and, in some cases, the funds of some foundations which were set up to support art and literature. It goes without saying that the main purpose of publishing for publishers is to earn money and keep it without having to spend it on e.g. their clients: The authors. As the revenue for hybrid publishing companies isn't entirely tied up with sale, but with funds and the more or less substantial fees from authors they may skip what's one of the most important part of the deal for the authors: PR. 

The author, up on a cloud, may be dreaming of that new career as a published writer which is what he/she wants the most. I think that's the main reason why people may, sort of, overlook the real substance of the contracts with these publishers. Having published with traditional publishers one takes for granted that sale of one's book is the main point for the hybrids, but no, it's not. To keep what fees and funds they've got is what it's about so they feel free to e.g. state some of their most important obligations as "PR as planned by publisher" which in some cases means none at all. In my opinion that spells CHEATING! Both The Independent Book Publishers Association and The Society of Authors and the Writers Guild of Great Britain have tried to curb the most scandalous of the hybrid publishers, but seemingly without success. - By the way, as far as I can see, right now we only have one hybrid publishing company in Denmark, namely Mellemgård which always seems to be the focus of angry and unsatisfied clients ....

It's confusing that some/most of these new publishing companies doesn't even identify as "either-or" set-ups because the borders of each type are wavering. Hybrid publishing in many ways looks like traditional publishing, but is anything but. In other ways it looks like self-publishing with a twist. Right now the publishing industry is very confusing and I fear that it shall get worse in the future as it's not regulated and the offers by the companies aren't transparent. One may sign up for something which turns out to be very different from what it looks like to newbie authors ....

 

Wikipedia

 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/337548986330055/permalink/481565705261715/ 

 

https://www.austinmacauley.com/about-us 

 

https://janeyburton.com/self-publishing-hybrid-vanity-a-simple-guide/ 

 

https://jerichowriters.com/everything-you-need-to-know-about-hybrid-publishing/ 

 

https://www.authorimprints.com/hybrid-publishing-self-publishing-definition/ 

 

The Chaotic World of Publishing

OK, someone wants to become a writer, but what starts at the computer has to venture into the publishing world and that gives rise to some serious questions of HOW and WHERE. As far as I can see right now there are only two main roads to publishing one's works, but I hope that in time we shall get some more - and easier as well as worth-while passages - into publishing. 

I was brought up with the so-called "traditional publishing" that went by the same rules with all the publishing houses I worked with: One wrote a script, had it accepted, signed a contract, had a sum for one's script, and then waited for the day the book was published. It went like clockwork, in an orderly manner: Both the author and the publishers knew what was expected of them and did what was necessary, also when it came to PR. This process of this kind of publishing held some not-so-pleasant possibilities of e.g. rejections, (severe) criticism, rewrites, etc. because it was based on co-operations with the staff of the publishers. Or put another way: One may have ideas, but some of them may be rejected by what actually becomes one's boss, namely the publisher. On the other hand, look on some of the bright sides of traditional publishing: One's book may become noticed by "The literary world", one may even win prizes and gain fame as what is called a "Serious or Genuine Writer". Also one may earn more money as books which were published by reputable publishers enter the shelves of bookstores, may be turned into a movie, etc., etc.. However, there is a drawback as it seems that one can't get into traditional publishing without an agent ....

Self-publishing offers some traits that's very alluring to the writer who likes to work on his/her own: He or she decides the plot, the cover, etc. with no interference from a publisher. However, the literary world as such doesn't hold self-published authors in high esteem. Also, these books tend  not to sell very well, no matter what literary qualities they may hold. As it is, with time this special way of publishing has sort of split up into a kind of hybrid of traditional publishing, which in a way pretends to be self-publishing: "Vanity Presses". They are run by special publishing houses which somehow have gained hold of writers who, more or less, have to do the work of what used to be done by traditional publishers. Not only do they have to toil with e.g. PR, but they also have to pay to get their books out. Actually, they may have to pay for the entire process without any guarantee of earnings. Right now there are quite a lot of these "Vanity Presses" which succeed in bleeding writers where they should be the ones who paid them. Obviously, this is not the best of times for writers, beset by "leeches" as they are, but what other ways of publishing are there? As far as I can see writers don't have other choices at the moment, but I'm sure that sooner or later they shall find some as they have to in order to keep doing what they want to do: To write ....