Bemoaning One's Youth

Live long enough and you too may end up bemoaning what's lost and which can never be retrieved: GONE IS GONE, and not even hard training, tough diets or weird medications can revive one's lost youth. 

However, some people think it's possible - at least up to a point - if one gets hold of stem cells as they are both for regeneration and renewal ....  

There are rumors about rich people harvesting fetus tissues to gain rejuvenating stem cells. Some of these rumors seem substantiated by facts, but even so they look like science fiction of the horror kind that's more than weird. For instance, it has been said that the lovers of a certain fashion designer purposely get pregnant by him to harvest aborted fetuses for him.

Slander? Maybe, and hopefully, yes! The very idea is utterly disgusting as it is some kind of vampyrism ....

 

https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/bone-marrow-transplant/in-depth/stem-cells/art-20048117

Insane Biblical Statements

 

 

Well, I suppose that most of his contemporaries didn't like something that logical - and evident ....

These days people are not all that much into the Biblical teachings - or are they???? On some of the websites I visit I often see people proclaiming a somewhat threadbare religious belief in the teachings of The Bible as well as a deep set fright of Hell. They are clinging to the belief they were brought up to honor as "the truth" out of fear of the presumably eternal torture of those hellish flames. Strangely enough they are not afraid of that old bully, called Yahweh. To me that's a proof that they have never read  The Bible.

Nonetheless this Biblical god who started out as the toyboy of the supreme god, namely the goddess Asherah, comes out as a socipath, and not the Santa-clone that he has been made out to be. For instance: Yahweh sent two she-bears to maul 42 boys for calling a man “baldy.” (2 Kings 2:23-24). Just like that? Yes, just like that ....

Why did Yahweh send a plague that killed a lot of people, not one time, but many times, actually over and over? For instance: Exodus 16:13, Numbers 11:31-35 

As might be expected Yahweh don't like unruly children: Deuteronomy 21:18-21 “If a man has a stubborn and rebellious son who will not obey the voice of his father or the voice of his mother, and, though they discipline him, will not listen to them, then his father and his mother shall take hold of him and bring him out to the elders of his city at the gate of the place where he lives, and they shall say to the elders of his city, ‘This our son is stubborn and rebellious; he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton and a drunkard.’ Then all the men of the city shall stone him to death with stones. So you shall purge the evil from your midst, and all Israel shall hear, and fear. - And: 2 Kings at 6:29: "So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him; and she hath hid her son." To be "righteous" in the Biblical sense of the word sure has some grim implications, and this is not the only time The Bible says something about parents eating their offspring: You will eat the flesh of your sons and the flesh of your daughters. (Leviticus 26:27-29) 

Not only murder, but cannibalism seems to be part of Yahweh's philosophy, as it's mentioned over and over, like e.g. here: 2 Kings 6:28-29; Jeremiah 19:1-9; Leviticus 26:27-29, etc., etc.. Murder sure comes easy to this ancient deity, like e.g. when he kills Onan for not getting his brother’s wife pregnant: Genesis 38:8-10. 

It goes on and on with killings of the innocent (e.g. babies or fetuses), but some details about Adam and Eve are interesting, even today as they mirror what we know about gods before this murder-deity attained supremacy. The legend is that Eve was created from one of Adam’s ribs, which is so very, very patriarchal = Man didn't come from woman (which he obviously did, coming out of her vagina!) but woman came from Adam's rib. 

Well, just as Yahweh was an old deity with roots in former religions so was Eve. She appears to be moulded on the ancient Sumerian goddess Ninti, the so-called "Lady of the Rib" also called "The Lady Who Gives Life". That figures and the more I think about it, the more interesting that part of it gets ....

I think that religious people of today have got into a habit of not READING what The Bible says. They just browse those parts of it that confirm their beliefs, and they never, never, never put it into a historical context which actually is where it belongs: 

 

The Double-Mirror

"I'm still looking good!"

Yes, you are, but you're neither looking your best nor how you think you are looking. To some that's an unforeseen tragedy, but to others it's nothing to worry about as looks aren't everything - or so they say .... However, without knowing it we often judge each other by looks. One of the places to see this system in action is many of the so-called "women subs". 

In these subs we may find an ongoing - and never-ending? - litany about men. This flow of words may turn into torrents about abuse, bad marriages, creepy sexual expectations and blatant sexism, but the point is that so much/most of it is a signal of focusing on anything, but what makes them strong and happy. It's a kind of going around in circles that doesn't bring any solutions to the main problem: These women NEED the feeling of accept, also by other women, but mostly by men, and a lot of their complaints go on their own insecurity, especially when it comes to looks and body value.

The truth is that we (i.e. most or many of us) tend to let our worth as a human being be set by others or what we feel they think about us. Men count as some sort of status symbol in the world of women as they themselves count as symbols of success and value in the world of men. However, to let this system gain status as the ultimate evaluating system is crazy. We know it, but still, it's to be seen in all these women subs that should be denouncing it, but which only is up to a certain point: That's not good in the long run ....

 

Thoughts About Crocodiles

Teasing the croc - WHAT FUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I saw a program about crocodiles some days ago, and I learnt something that made me think about the dangers of sizes: One big, tank like male croc sometimes  mistakes a female for a convenient snack. However, that doesn't happen all that often as the female really is FEMALE in looks, as well as in movement. First of all she may outsmart him, but also she may out-run him. Being muscular and tank like makes the male heavy and not limber: He can't catch her for all that surplus muscle weight as she is much more agile than him.

The same goes for someone like this poor man with a ruined body (which he most probably is very proud of!!!!). MEN have competed with MEN about being bigger than big more often than women. Big is something special with many men, dreaming of that elusive Alpha status, but to most women it's sort of hilarious to watch someone like this guy: He is not a dream beau to most women.
 

I have a very strong feeling that the ballet dancer Anna Pavlova would beat the muscle guy in a fair fight, using the weapons they are born with, including evasion and flight. To fight him, muscle to muscle, so to speak, would be stupid, also because he is much heavier than she is. Just like the hungry male croc he might subdue her by sitting on her, but she - being smart - would avoid something like that AND BEAT HIM ....

 

"The Love Game of the Patriarchy"

 

Is a wedding every woman's dream? No, it's not, but in most patriarchies it looks like a necessity because so much has been set up against the freedom - even the barest of bare respect - of women. Without freedom a woman can't make her way in a patriarchy, and without respect she may even hinder herself in gaining SELF-RESPECT. Tough rules need tough girls not to be totally unacceptable.  

From a time period that OPENLY operated with double-standards, one standard for him and one standard for her. For him to take advantage of a girl (of the "lower classes"?) and still get a bride of a "good family" for more than fun, she would have to accept this system of lies and social limits, depicting herself as "good", and the cum sock-girl of a "lower class" as "not good" girl. Maybe she never even questioned such a system because she had gained the status of "good"/"respectable" which to her was the guarantee of love

Having guarded her virginity for ages - actually, her entire life - she kept her market value and thus might marry into an even higher status: She went from a "Miss" to a Mrs.

As it is this system would never have had any success had it not been for the initial downplay of anything not supporting it, especially women's self-respect as human beings and not solely as "one of the female sex who may advance to the status of a Mrs". Being a woman she has been taught that she NEEDS a strong man to sort of giving her the "good enough-stamp" to become anything but a specimen of the "inferior sex".

However, times have been changing, and women have not kept subdued which is the crucial part of the system: Without that it doesn't work, and women have proved - over and over again, and not least to themselves - that they are and want more than something like that. They know that they are not the weak vessels who need male protection at all times, even though men have proved that they are not what they have been set up to be ....

When One Gets Targeted By Criminals

 

 

Did they succeed in their "Valet Stealing"? I hope not ....

I often get some very, very shady "offers" from scam agents, publishers, authors, etc., etc.. However, sometimes I even get messages from insane or just criminal individuals. This is an instance of such a message:

"Hi, You're running out of time.

It's important you pay a ttention t o this m essage right now. Take a minute to relax, breathe, and really dig into it. 'Cause we're about to discuss a deal between you and m e, a nd I ain't playing games. You don't know me however I know you very well and righ t now, yo u are think ing h ow, right?

Well, you've been treading on thin ice with your browsing habits, scrolling t hrough those videos and clicking on links, stumbling upon some not-so-safe sites. I placed a M alware on a po rn website and you visited it to watch (know what I mean?). When you were busy watchi ng videos, your system initiated op erating as a RDP (Remote Proto col) whic h pro vided m e tot al con trol over your device. I ca n peep at everything on your screen , flick on your camera a nd mic, and you wo uldn't even noti ce. Oh, and I've got access to a ll your emails , contacts, an d socia l me dia account s too.

Been keeping tabs on your pathetic life for a while now. It is simply your misfortune that I came across your bad deeds. I invested in more days than I probably sh ould have inves tigat ing into your dat a. Extracted quite a b it of juic y inf o from your s ystem. and I've s een it all. Yeah, Yeah, I've got footage of you doing filthy thi ngs in your house (nice setup, by the way). I then developed videos and screenshots where on one side of the screen, there's the videos you were p laying, and on the other half, i t is y ou jerking off. With just a cli ck, I can send this garbage to every single of your con tacts.

Your confusion is clear, but don't expect sympathy. Frankly, I am willing to wip e t he slate c lean, a nd allow you to mo ve on with y our daily life and forget y ou ever ex isted. I will offer you t wo alte rnatives.

1. is to tu rn a blind eye t o this e mail. L et us see what is going to happen if you opt this option. I will send your video to all of your contacts. The video was st raight fire, and I can't eve n fatho m th e embarras ement you' ll endure wh en you r colleague s, friends, and fam check it out. But hey, that's life, ain't it? Don't be playing the vi ctim here.

2. is to pay me, and be confident ial about it. We will name it my "privacy tip". Now Lets discuss what happens if you pick this option. Your dirty secret remains your secret. I will wipe everything clea n once yo u send payme nt. You hav e to ma ke the paym ent thr ough Bitcoins only. I want you to know I'm ai ming for a wi n-win h ere. My promis es are non-nego tiable.

Trans fer Amount: USD 1495
My BTC Address: 1E qSsMniG HwKU zp kCFWAfDg A7BLZWPEAeU (del whitespaces if any)

Once you pay up, you'll slee p like a baby . I keep my word.

Important: You now ha ve t wo da ys to make the payment an d I will only accept Bitco ins. My sy stem w ill catc h that B itco in payme nt an d wipe out all the dirt I got on you. Don't even think about replying to this or negotiating, it's pointless. The email and wallet are custom-m ade for you, untrace able . If I notic e that you 've share d or discus sed this mail wi th some one else, the video will instantly start getting sent to y our conta cts. And do n't even thi nk abou t turning off yo ur phone o r resetting it to facto ry settings. It's po intless. I don't make mistakes. I am waiti ng for my pa yment."

............................................................

Needless to say, I have the email address of this individual, and I'm going to report him to FBI even though I suspect that not much will come out of it ....

SHAMELESS As Don the Con

 

I don't know what this young lady did to deserve a scolding by the police, but that face is the very picture of something that normally keeps people in line: SHAME is the game, and it works with most of us because that's how we were brought up. "Shame on you!!!" is a potent war cry in many battles, even today, but it doesn't always work with everyone. Some people literally are OUT OF SHAME or DEVOID OF SHAME. One of these individuals is Don the Con, aka Donald Trump. 

Then what is "shame"? Well, according to "Britannica Dictionary" it's something most - but not all - of us recognize at once. I think "shame" may be the inner police officer keeping an eye upon us, who we are, what we do, and how we react when caught doing something SHAMELESS.

To be caught doing something against "the more or less implicit rules of society" would stop most individuals from doing what he/she is doing or has done: Repeats of that nasty deed would be SHAMEFUL. 

Yup, he/she was found out, was PROVEN guilty and thus is classified as culpable of something disgusting or "low class" that would make most people shameful enough to start regretting their ways. They don't like being PROVEN guilty as it's declassifying as a human: GOOD, honest and decent people are not supposed to associate with shameless individuals who don't have that "inner police officer" they themselves have. The reason? To associate with scum you yourself become scum = It's contagious!

Oops, inner police officer didn't like that!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Those who lack that "inner police officer" most often are dictators of some kind. They feel that they are in the right, no matter what they do, and what's more, they know how to play decent people and butt them on each other - or themselves via their inner police officer: "Self-blame" sure is a lovely weapon in the hands of the shameless ones and they love gluing it to everybody but themselves.

 

As well presumed other felonies we don't know of YET.

 

If a normal person was accused of one or two of these PROVEN felonies he/she would bow his/her head IN SHAME, but not Don the Con: There is no inner police officer telling him that what he did/does is wrong and that he should be ashamed of himself. No, he just shrugs and go on with whatever he was doing which is bad news for everyone else ....