The Mental TrickleDown

 

Exaggerated danger of MENTAL TrickleDown? No, I don't think so, and we should be alert to the dangers of growing up as a "Trickler". 

What America has become may very well be a prelude to something much worse. Losing its innocence has made it turn into something that looks very different from what it was.

From this image of former greatness to what? Well, as a mirror of what it used to be at a special historical moment it might turn into something like this:

These men are symbols of certain actions and ideologies which some find innocent, but which more and more see as a threat to everything that America used to be and which it should become in the future. After all, no country can sustain its image without rooting out what these images represent.
 

Certain individuals might love to see this image as the new Mount Rushmore which really is a potent symbol of what's going on in the USA right now. However, others find the very idea a deadly stab in the back of the USA they want to see in the future, namely the one that's not wrapped in "DIPS", "Insider tradings", sheer "bluff and theft". 

Boobs Out In The Free!

 

Presumably "Tea Cup Sallie"

Yup, some women don't need trays, but even so, most women wouldn't endanger one of their best assets with hot liquors of any kind: No coffee, no tea should get too close to what's both a part of their sexual attraction and their natural "milk station" for babies.

I bet this isn't a baby girl, but a baby boy because that way he may represent the "double consumer" of female breasts without being coarse. To see the happy smile of a baby doesn't suggest that his Mom is a "hoe" - or something like that - for ripping out what nature gave her to feed her baby: It's "innocence" in something that might be called a "desexualized sexualization" of breasts.

This joke is a very fine summary of what might be called "the breast situation in modern times": What this young woman is doing is very natural and in full accordance with her role, as well as obligation, as a mother. She is breastfeeding her child, but lo and behold, it's done in the open which turns it into something that seems to be suggesting a sexual act. Oops!!!! Not her wish, but the mind of the not breastfeeding gender see it that way because they have been conditioned to do so: First and foremost, women "are" sex-objects, and their breasts have been symbols of many different things in the Patriarchy.
 

What to do when one is a conscientious woman who want to do good for her baby? Well, don't be too free with those female assets if you don't want to provoke the public, even though it should be possible to do so without misunderstandings of any kind. 

Yup, that should do it, although there will be loads of people - male and female - who resent that possibility of gaining freedom, even for one night.

Teachings By Rape

 

Well, firstly, "bitches" don't move on anybody like he is describing his actions. And, by the way, I bet he will call these actions "seductions" even though they technically are rape, or attempted rape. Because Don the Con has lulled himself into this strong belief in the rights of a "star" he has earned the nickname he likes the least: Felon. However, no matter what, he is, and he stays a felon for his assault on E. Jean Carroll. 

As is well-known by all/most of us, what happens may be interpreted totally different by two - or more - people who experience the same event. Something that may drive the police up the wall with annoyance when questioning several witnesses who don't seem to have seen the same crime they have. What tRump did, and was convicted of doing, to e. Jean Carroll was gross and demeaning of her as a woman. I'm glad she won her lawsuit, but I doubt she shall ever have the money he was to pay her for his assault on her - at least I haven't heard that she has got it yet, which doesn't bode well for her.

Now, why do I snigger involuntarily when reading about Olga, when I get fumingly angry when just thinking of Don the Con with E. Jean Carroll and the other 25 victims who have accused him over time? That doesn't seem fair, but that is how it is: I find the female sex offender "funny", maybe even cool up to a point, but the male offender I want to tar and feather or even worse. I think the cause of this is that the male's rape of a woman is sort of built into the Patriarchy, whereas the woman's assault on a man is a rare event, something that doesn't fit the general image of the sexes: Men are being suspected of doing something like that because the statistics tell that that's what they do now and then, whereas it's more seldom in women. We haven't got used to the idea of female rape yet, but it does happen now and then, for instance in older woman-younger men-constellations. 

 

Not that I find female rape a good idea, but maybe that's the only crime that may make it obvious to men that they should stop their all too common assaults on women.

Virgin Birth

The so-called "Virgin" was a young woman who was engaged to get married to an older man. Nothing strange in that, as that was what many young women experienced - and still do - in The Middle East. The strangeness of her fate doesn't appear until she - THE VIRGIN BRIDE!!!! - gives birth to a boy before marrying her betrothed, Joseph, claiming that God himself is the father of the child.

 

As we know this legend started a mental as well as political process of changing the Jewish faith into a new religion of a "virgin" giving birth without having sex. In a way that turns the focus on Jesus onto his mother, "The Virgin", but that focus has only been kept by The Catholic Church and cthey don't take the next step: Could it be that Mary got pregnant on her own, with no assistance of anybody, Yahweh, Joseph or an anonymous goat herder?

Naahh, the believers will say, that's impossible, as it takes two to have a baby. Actually, such a belief of a virgin birth would be in concordance with some of the older religions, but that's not as interesting as the biological possibilities: Would a woman be able to give birth without having sex? Most people would say "NO!!!", but I'll say that with the use of artificial sperm, it's possible to skip sex to have a baby. Or, rather, that's what is about to happen in the future when science moves from e.g. mice to humans. As far as I know, nobody has tried to make a woman give birth after fertilizing her with artificial sperm, although the system is working in animals.

Mary and artificial sperm aside we still have one question: Could a female human - also known as a "woman" - become pregnant on her own? Naahh, it doesn't seem so, or it happens very seldom according to Wikipedia: "In 1955, Helen Spurway, a geneticist specializing in the reproductive biology of the guppy (Lebistes reticulatus), claimed that parthenogenesis may occur (though very rarely) in humans, leading to so-called "virgin births". This created some sensation among her colleagues and the lay public alike. Sometimes an embryo may begin to divide without fertilization, but it cannot fully develop on its own; so while it may create some skin and nerve cells, it cannot create others (such as skeletal muscle) and becomes a type of benign tumor called an ovarian teratoma. Spontaneous ovarian activation is not rare and has been known about since the 19th century. Some teratomas can even become primitive fetuses (fetiform teratoma) with imperfect heads, limbs and other structures, but are non-viable." 

 

^{OK, if you say so - although you're a grandmother}

 

Virgin birth - also called "parthenogenesis" - is common (List of taxa that use parthenogenesis) in some plants as well as invertebrates, and most often favoring female offspring which may be the exact copies of their single parent: The mother. As it is, in biology the male human may be put out of business, so to speak, but I've never heard any women suggest that as a solution to gender wars, misogyny, etc. - at least not yet ....

 

 

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2023/05/27/1177191913/sperm-or-egg-in-lab-breakthrough-in-reproduction-designer-babies-ivg 

 

 

Wikipedia

Stealing The Money!!!

 

Basically, to be eaten by a dragon or by the political system of modern times is the same: Eaten you are and others are harvesting what you toiled to turn into the nest-egg that would save your Golden Years, yes, maybe even the lives of you and your family. In America a big part of this Eater-Free-To-Eat-system is what's called The TrickleDown, and it's nothing but a state established robbery of people who don't own much. The less you have, the more you're being robbed, and it's disgusting to watch how Americans are forced into paying for nothing.

Allegedly, the TrickleDown should go from the rich to the non-rich, but in reality that's not the case: It goes from the non-rich to the rich, and there it stays. I shall NEVER, for the life of me, understand why the American people don't revolt against such a system which I see as criminal. As an European I'm used to a system of governments which administer taxes from the people for the common good of the country, but not sort of direct it into the pockets of the wealthy by letting them off the tax-payer-hook. No taxes for billionaires mean loads of taxes for non-billionaires.

 
 

Caught In The Trap Of Narcissism

 

What's wrong with enjoying a luxurious life with servants and a lot of money to pay for their service as well as everything else one wants? Something like that is the dream of many who toil on a daily basis without ever being able to just feel economically safe in a tumultuous world. The frustrations building up sap their lives of what might otherwise be seen as good features, something to be proud of or just enjoy. In my opinion, morally, it is wrong to live - or just long for - this kind of a life of leisure with no deep feelings of social obligations, simply because we are part of a society and shouldn't sort of hover above it like that's not the case. Also, I find it morally wrong to blind oneself to the life conditions of other people whom one, knowingly or not, may exploit. 

Well, what kind of individual would have no qualms at exploiting their fellow human beings? Without any hesitation, I would say a narcissist, someone who only have eyes for him- or herself.

Of course, being a narcissist, this guy will always prefer his own mirror image to anybody else, no matter what. Somebody like that would even trample whoever was in his way to get to that mirror in the hope of getting yet another chance of boosting his stupendous ego. They have a way of not seeing their own blemishes and get very upset when others point out that the six-pack of their imagination actually is flab.

tRump is so very easy to make fun of or to target for an excessive vanity. His claim that people have told him that he is the spitting image of Elvis Presley is ludicrous, unless it's about the singer a few years before his death. One may laugh, and then one might think a little bit of the reasons of Don the Con for this need of being considered handsome when the mirror - and his doctors - should be able to tell him the truth that he is and looks as the physically and mentally wreck he is. That said, looks or not, he is a malignant, narcissistic, pathologically lying conman, who has made $ billions by cheating his way through life with no concern for other people.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-heart-disease-medical-walter-reed-us-president-health-birther-diet-doctors-a8165371.html 

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4936068-omarosa-manigault-newman-trump-medical-history/?tb

Wikipedia

The Incel-"Hero"

 

Bianca Devins (2001-2019) was a lovely as well as gifted young woman. Although having had to fight depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder the life of this 17 years old girl was full of promises for a beautiful future, but her death was a scandal: She was butchered by an acquaintance, Andrew Clark, who wanted more than just friendship. Not the first time something like that happens, but this murder was different, as it became a sort of incel-manifesto when the murderer made photos and videos of her dead body public. Some embittered incels saw the murderer as a sort of "freedom fighter", revenging what they saw as an "unfair celibacy" of young men.

Somehow these young men feel "entitled" to have sex, also with girls and women who exhibit or have any interest in either them or sexual relationships as such. They feel "cheated" of an imaginary "right to" sex, and may turn into more or less criminal ways of getting what they want, e.g. by stalking, raping or, as in this case, murdering a woman. Bianca was stalked and harassed by incels for at least two years, but she may not have been aware that her "friend", Andrew Clark, might be one of the stalkers, and that he had designs on her that didn't fit her ideas of their friendship.

Nothing on this Earth gives a man the "right" to have sex with a woman at will, but those incels, who feel that way, may ignore that fact, demanding what's not theirs to demand. Women of former times have been brought up with a sense of feeling sorry and also protective of men, but that steep delusion may have been brought to an end with a better understanding of what's going on.

As to Bianca she may have lost her life because she kissed someone whom she really liked which her incel-"friend", Andrew Clark, saw as a grave insult because she wasn't into him in a sexual manner. Something she had tried to explain to him, but obviously in vain. After the murder, the police found proof that he had researched methods of killing people, which suggests that it was pre-meditated.

These angry and embittered incels seem to be all over the internet, accusing women of weird designs on the male happiness they feel entitled to. Some are discussing their own physical shortcomings as they feel that had they been taller, shorter, slimmer or whatever, but especially richer, women would choose them for sex. They overall-image of women is that the female gender is economic exploiters of men, also when the women they berate are their own breadwinners, maybe of a family with children. It's both stupid and unfair, but it's also harmful in another manner: It keeps the incels locked into their own false ideas, unable to change and learn.

 

https://www.zerotolerance.org.uk/news/blog/the-five-core-elements-of-incel-ideology/

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-44053828 

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bianca-devins-murder-family-targeted-online-community/

 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-teens-murder-photos-viral-prompting-mom-help-change-law 

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/bianca-devins-murder-brandon-andrew-clark-858874/ 

 

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/bianca-devins-murder-brandon-andrew-clark-858874/ 

 

https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/incel-and-the-incelosphere-an-overview-of-current-research-and-understanding/ 

 

https://boobytrapec.blogspot.com/2023/07/incel-ignorance-and-hatred.html