SEX On The Brain

 

Jimmy Savile (1926–2011)

Who was he? I was surprised to see his biography in some old notes, but then there have been - or are - so many rapists and serial killers out there that it's quite impossible to keep track of all of them and their many victims. Also, strangely enough, some of them, although being totally demonic weirdos, get forgotten by the public because they don't have the superficial charm and "aura" of e.g. a Ted Bundy. A fact that speaks volumes about us, the non-criminals, who are also a special kind of "consumer" of all the grizzlies of murder and all kinds of violence: A lot of people - me too when I'm out to seek information about the intricacies of society - buy books, magazines and watch documentaries about these criminals "for fun" and entertainment. 

As to the Englishman Jimmy Savile he is even more special than the American "charmer", Bundy, because he too had charisma, and although not as good-looking as him, he got a career out of it as a beloved media personality. What's more strange is that not only was he admired and sought out by powerful people like e.g. Margareth Thatcher, but he was also knighted. 

Famous, beloved, knighted and ALIVE without any threats of the conviction and execution Bundy had to endure: Savile was never caught although the numbers of his victims are estimated to be c. 450-589 - some say 1000! How was that possible? Well, he was a famous and beloved television personality and with that kind of "shield" he seems to have been protected against suspicions until a year after his death in 2011. At that time rumors about his many sexual transgressions were heard, and in October 2012 a formal inverstigation was started. One of the conclusions was that over 50 years Savile had assaulted victims aged between 5 and 75 in NHS hospitals, some were paralyzed, others were dead. The gender of his victims wasn't important to him, he didn't discriminate, but targeted males and females alike, as well as adults and children. His key to these victims was his job at BBC as well as his charitable work for The National Health Service.

For several years there had been rumors that the bachelor Savile was into "little girls". In an interview he said that he actually didn't like children, and that the girls gathering around him did so because he "knew the pop-stars they admired". However, the rumors persisted, and some even were broadcasted in newspaper articles in "The Sun". Still, he was never prosecuted. Many may have seen him as an innocent man being harrassed by some "bad people of the press".
 

However, after his death an ITV-documentary, "Exposure: The Other Side of Jimmy Savile", was made public. Thus it was made known that the rumors were true, and that the popular "cozy-uncle" in reality was a sexual predator of people of all ages, both sexes, dead or alive.

Jimmy Savile's ornate black granite headstone only stood for 19 days. Following awareness of his abusive past, it was removed, during the night of 9–10 October 2012, at his family's request "out of respect" to public opinion and others buried in and visiting the cemetery. A cafee which were named after him had its name changed, and The University of Bedfordshire stripped him of the honorary degree it had awarded him. Many others who had loved him enough to name something after him chose to have it renamed. What he had had of fame and renown before his death turned totally "sour" when he died. 

 

https://news.sky.com/story/thatcher-pushed-for-jimmy-savile-knighthood-10439997 

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-19984684 

 

https://www.netflix.com/dk/title/81520549 

 

Britannica

 

Wikipedia

 

When Money Is The Issue

Yup, that really is a very weird phenomenon, and it seems that all kinds of earnings are into it: Born as slow tortoises, money somehow change into fast-moving rabbits

I have to admit that I don't know all that much about the intricacies of the monetary systems of this world, but part of it, like e.g. the American TrickleDown-theft that has been going on for 50 years or so, always makes me fume with indignation. It's totally respectless of the American people who are not billionaires. The "logic" of it has been disproved over and over, and still the idea that poor people experience positive effects when rich people get richer, e.g. by an insane taxing system, and spend more money has not been kicked out as the lie it is.

I often ask Americans on the websites I visit WHY they don't get rid of such a ridiculous and unfair system, but I've never got a good answer to that question. In Europe we pay taxes to secure the common good of the countries where we live as well as ourselves as private citizens, but not so in the USA, why? It's crazy not to tax billionaires more than they are being taxed now, but instead target the "common folks" who thus may end up toiling for those who have the money they themselves lack for food and housing.

tRump being tRump something like this - and there is much more - doesn't really surprise me. I'm disgusted, but not overwhelmed with feelings of surprise at this "knife in the back" of the ordinary, (very, very often) hard-working people of America because that's what the detestable and, in my opinion, criminal TrickleDown-system is about: Exploitation. 

TrickleDown is a TRICK to make the money of the poor end up in the pockets of the rich, where it stays untouched by The Internal Revenue. Weird, to say the least ....

I published some ebooks (KDP) on Amazon last year, but I unpublished all of them over my indignation of this and other "smart" systems. It was a weird feeling to press the unpublish-button, but it had to be done .... These are some of the books, as there are more.

 

 

 

 

 

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/trickle-down 

 

https://www.law.georgetown.edu/denny-center/blog/reaganomics/ 

 

Wikipedia

When Princesses Have Had Enough!!!!

 

 

It's very understandable that all those fairy tale princesses have had enough, but why do they take it out on Alice??? I think I know the answer to that: Being set up as images of patriarchal "dream girls" left most of them sort of "glued" to the spot without nothing else to wait, wait and WAIT for that damn, slow prince they had been told would "find and rescue them". Before he did, they were not allowed to do anything, but looking their best - whatever that is - and maybe also console themselves with too many sweets, thus ending up being even more "glued to the spot".

What else did she have to entertain herself with, but fattening and unhealthy food? Well, those animals who befriended her had their own life to see to and couldn't always be at her beck and call.

And then when that prince came, he turned out to be a thorough imbecile - actually a man-child or maybe even a clown! How could someone like that be "the man of her dreams"???? Had she not been living her dull Cinderella-life, she wouldn't have considered anybody like him, handsome or not.

I agree 100% with trick-corr-treat: She would have been better off without this weird prince. However, the myths, the legends and fairy tales tell little girls that someone like him is necessary to change their lives for something better - or just to get moving from that dull, prison like castle or tower. What use is it to let one's hair fall down to the ground like with Rapunzel when one is not allowed to follow it? It may look impressive, but to whom? That prince who has come to "rescue" one? What if Rapunzel doesn't like him, or he has a thing for brunettes, but not for blondes?

Yup, I fully understand why all those fairy tale princesses may be envious of Alice because they feel that she is allowed to live life to the full whereas they have to stay put until they are being "rescued". Just think of all the interesting persons she encountered when she entered that rabbit's hole!

 

It's not fair to take their envy out on Alice, but I must admit that I understand all those frustrated princesses. The boredom they endured must have been killing!

 

 

Stepmom of SnowWhite

 

Come on, take a bite, eat my apple
nothing to fear, I guess
or if so, you had your time
taken out of mine, that is

yes, you had it all, dimples and peach skin
however, youth only lasts until the apple works
then old age reigns again

Had I been a loving mother, I would have warned you
against Father Time, the executioner, torturing and killing
all the time tic-tocking beauty and youth into oblivion
lucky you, being saved from that by me

However, laid bare to whatever "prince" who comes by

As it is, my snake's-heart brewed a poison
all for your dimples and peach skin
some for my old age and waning beauty
everything else for my love of my mirror
what came first is me, once young and innocent
a snow-white lily with a touch of vampire blood

The Rape "Game"

 

Now, what is this? Could it be a pamphlet AGAINST rape, warning men that that fantasy they have about abducting, binding, torturing, raping and maybe even killing women is not good for either them or said woman? Naaahhh, the wording is more like "have fun, doing sexy acts with "party girls" (whatever that is)"

As we know, Erotic transference is quite common. Many (?) women may dream of a situation like that, but how many - and whom - have acted out that fantasy? Almost nobody, whereas countless men have acted upon their fantasies of empowering women who somehow "tickle their funny bone", so to speak. Actually, these women may not even notice them, but that isn't obvious to the men who are caught up in fantasies of "girls lusting for their body". 

I would say that this particular case may look like a joke, but it's anything but funny if red under-wear is being seen as a sexual invite because of the color. After all, there is a reason why underwear is called under-wear: It's not being flaunted unless the clothes covering it is being ripped off. Not even if the rape victim had been stark naked, it would be an invitation to just everybody who might have a fantasy of her or someone like her. Men's fantasies don't oblige her in any way, just as her fantasies don't oblige them.

Even serial rapists and/or killers like e.g. Ted Bundy have said that porn sent them headlong into those erotic transferences of a non-violent and non-criminal sex urge into dreams of acts that grew more and more wild with the actual experience of rape and murder: The more women they raped and killed, the more they needed this stimulation to get sexual satisfaction. Without that, they were left with those "blue balls" all of them hate.

 

In a Patriarchy, girls are being taught from an early age that they should behave in a certain manner not to provoke the allegedly predatory male sex drive. It may be wise in certain cultures, but it shouldn't be necessary. However, new tricks are appearing everywhere, and it's annoying that women and girls aren't safe when they go out to have a drink or more. I'm glad to know that some bars, etc. see the problem and do their best to help the women.

 

 

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/590549 

 

https://medium.com/@russellhowell86/mens-sexual-fantasies-26930278d8c5 

 

https://boobytrapec.blogspot.com/2024/06/blue-as-balls.html 

 

Wikipedia 

 

 

The REALITY of the Assumed Reality

 

No, one doesn't turn into the person whose looks one borrows for a short spell, even though the new, "natural" silicon masks may make one feel that way. The same goes for digital AI-images that are able to turn one's true - i.e. GENUINE, NATURAL - persona into something quite different. To cheat by making oneself look like a beauty queen when on the net may not be all that seldom, whereas it would be to turn oneself into a sort of Quasimodo when one in reality is a beauty queen. People expect those they have romantic affairs with on websites, chat-rooms or whatever to be what they say they are and to look like they said. As we know - e.g. from the MTV-show "Catfish" - that's not always the case. Some get very offended that the one they declared to love wasn't a handsome hunk, but Quasimodo.

Charles Laughton as Quasimodo

However, the everyday transformation of women when applying make-up is considered more of an obligation than "cheating". It may be very obvious that a specific woman doesn't have eye-lashes that long, but somehow these additions to her looks become part of whom she is and thus what people expect her to look at all times - which she most certainly doesn't.

At what stage escapes one's true personality and turns into what is expected by other people? That moment is difficult to pinpoint, and I shall skip it for now and instead look at one special aspect with this make-belief-trap: Make-up signals that this specific and made-up woman adheres to her assigned role. That may not be what she herself wanted, but that is what most of those who see her think. Once I read that some women without make-up were harassed in Japan for being perceived as "feminist" which the fragile male egos couldn't take.

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/uk/beauty/skin/g38588295/celebs-without-make-up/

The Mental TrickleDown

 

Exaggerated danger of MENTAL TrickleDown? No, I don't think so, and we should be alert to the dangers of growing up as a "Trickler". 

What America has become may very well be a prelude to something much worse. Losing its innocence has made it turn into something that looks very different from what it was.

From this image of former greatness to what? Well, as a mirror of what it used to be at a special historical moment it might turn into something like this:

These men are symbols of certain actions and ideologies which some find innocent, but which more and more see as a threat to everything that America used to be and which it should become in the future. After all, no country can sustain its image without rooting out what these images represent.
 

Certain individuals might love to see this image as the new Mount Rushmore which really is a potent symbol of what's going on in the USA right now. However, others find the very idea a deadly stab in the back of the USA they want to see in the future, namely the one that's not wrapped in "DIPS", "Insider tradings", sheer "bluff and theft".