lørdag den 19. juli 2025

Exploitation of A Teenage-Queen

Lady Jane Grey (1536/1537–1554), Aka Lady Jane Dudley, Aka "The Nine Days Queen"

Being the cousin of Edward VI (1537-1553), and his half-sisters, Mary (I) and Elizabeth (I) didn't save the life of this great-granddaughter of Henry VII through his youngest daughter, Mary Tudor. Neither did it save her to become the heiress of king Edward VI and thus inheriting his throne as the Queen of England and Ireland on the 10th of July, 1553. On the contrary, it cost her her life as she was deposed by the Privy Council of England on the 19th of July, 1553, and beheaded in the morning of the 12th of February, 1554.

 

The irony of this sad tale of a young queen's downfall was that Jane didn't even want to inherit the throne of her cousin. She, who was brought up to be a dedicated Protestant, was a very learned and intellectual, young woman for her time, speaking and studying Latin, Hebrew and Greek. Hunting and other normal pastimes for people of her class didn't appeal to her as much as various academic studies. Nothing indicates that she was pining for the exalted status of the monarchy or that she had even thought about who was to inherit the throne of her cousin, Edward VI.

The son of Henry VIII and his third wife, Jane Seymour, Edward VI was brought up to believe that his half-sisters, Mary (I) and Elizabeth (I) were disowned by their father and that they were "illegitimate". As it was, Henry VIII had been married to their mothers, but the circumstances of both these marriages had turned the king against his daughters. In the opinion of Edward, and out of respect for his late father, none of them were acceptable as queens of England. Thus the natural heir to his throne would be his cousin, namely the great-granddaughter of Henry VII, 16 or 17 year old Jane Grey. However, one of his ulterior motives for choosing Jane over his eldest half-sister, Mary, was that she was a protestant, whereas Mary was a staunch Catholic.

 

Edward VI's "devise for the Succession"

Jane had not yet been crowned as a queen, and that may have given those who supported Mary's claim to the throne hope. The Privy Council, which had accepted the choice by Edward VI and thus honored Jane as the queen, suddenly changed sides and deposed her, only ten days after proclaiming her his heiress. That meant that Mary won the game, so to speak, and became the new queen on 19 July 1553. 

 

Mary I 

Poor Jane, she obviously was more of a puppet for her very ambitious father-in-law, John Dudley, 1st Duke of Northumberland. Mary knew that and intended to spare her life as an innocent victim of her father-in-law's machinations, but then Jane's father did something in her opinion unforgivable: He became involved with Wyatt's rebellion against Mary's intention of marrying her maternal relative, Philip of Spain. As Mary was set upon this marriage his "treason" became the last straw, so to speak, and both Jane and her husband were executed on 12 February 1554. I see that as very unfair to the teenager who didn't have the ambitions of becoming the new monarch, but was talked into accepting the throne that was handed her by the late king, Edward VI. 

 This portrait may be of Jane as she looked at the time of her death. If so, then there is a strong resemblance to her cousin, Elizabeth I

 

https://www.hrp.org.uk/tower-of-london/history-and-stories/lady-jane-grey/ 

 

Wikipedia 

 

Britannica 


fredag den 18. juli 2025

The American Bonaparte

 


 
The beautiful American heiress Elizabeth Patterson (1785-1879) was considered a "catch" as her Maryland-family was affluent and of good standing with many influential people of their own class. Her father, William Patterson, was an Irish immigrant who had done well in his new country of America, as he was the second richest man in Maryland. His son, Robert, got married to the daughter, namely Marianne Caton, of the richest man in Maryland, Charles Carroll. The Caroll-family could boast an arch bishop, and the 24th of December, 1803, he married a young couple, 18 and 20 years old. The young bride, Elizabeth Patterson, wore what was considered a "risque" gown, but that wasn't the reason why the First Consul from 1799 to 1804, Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) was enraged by this wedding. And yup, this was that enraged Bonaparte:
 

Napoleon Bonaparte who was to become Emperor Napoleon I on the 2nd of December 1804
 
 
 
Napoleon's enormous ambitions were not only for himself, but for his entire family, and he had other plans for the young man who married Elizabeth Patterson, namely his youngest brother, Jerome (1784-1860). There was no way Napoleon would accept this young, American woman as his sister-in-law, heiress and beauty or not.
 
 
 
Mr. and Mrs. Jerome Bonaparte
 
Before the wedding, Elizabeth's father, William Patterson, had received several more or less anonymous letters, some of them telling him that Jerome was a Casanova, out to seduce and then leave his daughter. All these letters were aimed at putting a stop to the wedding, but that didn't happen: Married they were, and then the threats from France changed into demands for an annulment. Obviously, there was no way, that the by now French emperor, Napoleon I, would accept the American marriage of his youngest brother. When the young couple set off to France to reason with him, he ushered a prohibition of her as much as setting foot on any country, that he ruled. It didn't exactly help the situation that she by now was pregnant: He still demanded an annulment of the otherwise fully legal marriage.
 
 
 
Jerome went to France, but Elizabeth chose to give birth to their son, Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte (1805-1870) in England. At the same time, Napoleon I did his best to make the then Pope annul the marriage of his brother and "that unfit American girl". When he didn't succeed, he simply annulled it himself in his capacity of Emperor, just as he himself, and not the pope, had crowned himself. As to the young father, Jerome Bonaparte, then he didn't put up much of a fight for his American wife. A fact that most likely stems from his "wild life" when a bachelor: He didn't have any money, but was landed with a substantial debt. Napoleon I, being so very ambitious for his family, made his brother marry the German princess Catharina of Wurttemberg. Also he was made a prince of Montfort and the king of Westphalen.
 
 
 
Jerome and his new wife, Catharina
 
Well, Napoleon I met his Waterloo in 1815, and his power over the royal houses of Europe which he had used for marrying his siblings off, was evaporating into thin air. His brother, Jerome, only kept his kingdom of Westphalen for six years, but in his marriage to Catharina he had two more sons and one daughter. When Catharina died in 1835, he married a very wealthy Italian noblewoman, Giustina Pecori-Suárez, in 1840, but whom he, for reasons unknown, kept secret for a long time. However, legally she was his wife, but he ended up divorcing her for an alleged adultery with one of his own illegitimate sons.
 
 
 
Giustina Pecori-Suárez 
 
At the same time, he tried to get some kind of reconciliation with Elizabeth who never remarried. He wanted her to send their son to him, but she refused: Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte stayed with her, becoming a successful American. 
 

Jerome Napoleon Bonaparte  
 
Even though Jerome studied law, he never practiced, but turned into what may be called a "gentleman-farmer". In his marriage to the heiress, Susan May Williams, he became the father of two sons, one of them was Charles Joseph Bonaparte (1851–1921), who also became a lawyer. He was a well-known liberal, fighting for humane laws, e.g. for blacks. When Theodore Roosevelt was the president, he was one of his men, and as such he started "The Bureau of Investigation", which became the FBI of today. 
 
 
 
Charles Joseph Bonaparte 
 
Wonder what Napoleon I would have said had he known that his intricate web of royal houses of Europe would crumble, but the American one, which he had refused to accept, would thrive and even grow stronger. That might have been a mental Waterloo for the once so mighty Emperor of France.
 

 Charles Joseph Bonaparte
 

torsdag den 17. juli 2025

When Amazon Is WEIRD



Last year I published several ebooks with Amazon, some of which are listed above. It was fun, up to a point, namely until I realized that the policy of the Trumpian wingman Jeff Bezos was as bad as the one of Mark Zuckerberg. Well, what can I say, except that I'm a woman of principles so all of a sudden, Amazon became a no-no-place for me. That's why I pulled all the ebooks that I myself had published with Amazon, but not those others had published as part of their publishing program. The list of my books with Amazon shrank to a minimum.
 
 
It felt quite good, but at the same time sad, but no matter how I felt, I couldn't overlook the fact that Bezos and Amazon are part of what I call the "tRump-Mafia" which is something I detest. However, after having pulled my Amazon-ebooks I started to notice the many complaints of my fellow writers, like e.g. this one on REDDIT, but without bringing the name of the person who wrote it: 
 
"My KDP was terminated for no reason. My entire body is shaking. I've published 14 books of fiction on Amazon and today I logged into my KDP account, and it said my account was terminated. There was no reason listed. I've received no email from Amazon or KDP. There was a "contact us" - and I sent a short email asking what had happened and that I had no idea why. As of this moment, my books are still listed on Amazon, but I suppose that will change and they will be taken down. Ten years of writing and self publishing, and I have played by all the rules. I truly jave zero ideas why this happened to me. I have even stopped publishing "wide" because I never wanted to "upset" Amazon if I was running a promotion and mis-remembered to pull a book down from Kobo during the promotion. I'm living in a nightmare. I welcome support. This came out of nowhere. I've purchased every cover image, worked with professional cover designers, have a Canva premium account where I use images that they have for marketing, also for marketing I purchase images off Depositphotos. Absolutely no clue. Dying here ...."

I know the name of this Amazon-writer, and I must say, that she certainly worked in a very serious manner. Her publishing-program is quite impressive, and should have secured her safety at the Amazon-platform. Was it her books they didn't like, or did they just feel like "deleting something" and chose her? As far as I know, she still hasn't received the reasons for why this happened to her, which brings me to a new point in this Amazon-tale: She is not the only one who may tell a gruesome tale of being ditched by Amazon. 

Another Amazon-user tells how the same happened to him, but that his books are still up. That's weird, and I wonder whether he is the victim of some kind of "shadow-banning": The page looks all right, but one is banned, and thus there is no sale.

One of those who have had the same experience indicates that the problem may be connected to the use of AI, which is not accepted anymore. However, there is no indication that that was the case, so there is really cause for alarm. The bereaved one points out troubles that are unbearable for a writer who made an effort when publishing:

"All my marketing, all my time and effort and all my reviews will go up in smoke. It's unbelievable. Not one word or email from Amazon or KDP about why or what is happening." 

Yup, that's what happens to most of those writers who don't treat their writings as a career and a trade which, in my opinion, ruins or disrupts the fun of it 

A lot of people on REDDIT tell their sorrowful tales of having had the same or similar experiences, and some also bring good advice: "They might have emailed you something you missed. My advice is to stay calm and polite in each email you send and to keep replies in the same email chain so you're not staring a new help ticket each time and there's a paper trail of their responses." That's sound advice, and in the end it may lead to a solution. At least, that's what I hope for her, also because to read that other authors have experienced what she did is shocking because to write and publish a book is something that resembles giving birth to a baby. One may not be quite happy with the life and destiny of one's child, but still, being the parent of someone means that everything bad happening to him/her stabs one in the heart ....

tirsdag den 15. juli 2025

The "Fight" of the Boobs

 
Nobody has ever suggested that the Italian actress Sophia Loren (born the 20th of September 1934) wasn't a busty lady. How could they when she in her looks came very, very close to embodying the main female ideal of the 1950-1960'ies? That ideal was to be "curvy": Big breasts and full hips with a tiny waist, and all of that she was able to boast. Everything was in its place, so to speak, but I'm not sure that she was right when she said she owed it all to spaghetti. 
 
 
Anyway, Sophia was a world-famous movie star even before she met her American colleague, Jayne Mansfield (1933-1967), in Beverly Hills at the exclusive Romanoff's restaurant in 1957. 
 
 
 
That meeting gave rise to its own legends, when one of the photographers took a photo of these two busty ladies, and Sophia was caught glancing - or staring? - at the breasts of Jayne. 
 
 

Later on, she said that she was afraid that they might escape the dress of Jayne and thus give vent to a scandal, but the truth is that she looked utterly shocked which by many people was seen as envy as if she felt "out-busted" by the American star. As a bust being the key to a movie career in those days, it wasn't all that farfetched to interpret her side glance as a signal of envy, but what did she have to be envious about? Nothing!!!!
 
 
However, the peak time of the busty female stars was nearing its end with the birth of a new female beauty ideal. I think it started in 1953 when Audrey Hepburn gained fame with "Roman Holiday". She became the very first actress to win an Academy Award, a Golden Globe Award and a BAFTA Award for a single performance. In that same year, she also won a Tony Award for Best Leading Actress in a Play for her performance on "Ondine" without boasting a bust. On the contrary .... 
 

https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-jealousy-5190471 

 

Wikipedia 


søndag den 13. juli 2025

Weird or Embarrasing Parents

 

 

Well, some parents are not just weird, but proud of being very, very strange. Also, they have a way of embarrassing their children, especially when they are with friends. As to the one above, I'm not sure that she did what she said. Actually, it's such a dumb ruse that I don't believe her - but still, it may have happened .... 

What are kids for? Right, they may come handy ....

Some poor children really have a hard time dealing with weird parents. Many stay weird even when moving to another country:  

Quora-question: "How can I deal with my parents being weird and strict? Honestly, they are so weird that they embarrass me in front of my friends. What can I do? By the way, my parents were both immigrants to the U.S. 20 years ago, but they still act Asian."

That's tough, as the only way to put an end to that situation will be to disown the Asian parents and start looking for some American ones. Hopefully, the frustrated Asian kid doesn't end up with someone like this:

In her opinion, a strangled baby may be better than no baby

Good times were once many years ago, and, sadly enough, many forget that they had such fun with a loving parent. They may even feel that they had an awful childhood.


Yup, the back of most grown-ups are built for piggy rides

 

Unfortunately, living in a patriarchy, some (mostly male) parents don't feel the same happiness at the birth of a daughter than of a son. For instance, king Henry VIII of England was very, very disappointed at the birth of his daughters, Mary and Elizabeth. Only Edward (VI) made him rejoice, as he needed a male heir to save the Tudor-dynasty. Actually, his daughters were of much more historical value ....

 

OK, I admit it's somewhat weird, but so what when it's also very, very loving?


A happy moment to remember when the time of old age comes for the big one, and adulthood for the small one, but, alas, many forget that it happened 

As long as we can't shop parents - or kids - we shall have to come to terms with "weirdness" while rejecting cruelty, abuse or murder. 

  

https://www.parents.com/ 

 

Wikipedia


lørdag den 12. juli 2025

Gender Role Playings And Spying

The Chinese soprano, Shi Pei Pu (1938–30 June 2009) was 70 years old when he/she died at the nursing home where he/she had lived for quite some time. He/She had been a librettist and soprano for the Beijing Opera and besides that he/she taught Chinese to foreign diplomat families.The fact that he/she, who was born a male, had been engaged in one of the craziest love affairs of the century makes him/her an early LGBT-individual, but not solely by choice. No, his/her female roles at the Beijing Opera gave him/her a false identity as a woman and the young French diplomat Bernard Boursicot became obsessed with him/her. He was convinced that the illustrious opera diva, Shi Pei Pu, really was a biological woman. 

The beautiful voice and studied female beauty of Shi Pei Pu enthralled Boursicot when he encountered the famous opera singer in 1964. Being very inexperienced he didn't expect foul play when his Chinese lover proclaimed that their love making - always in total darkness - had led to a pregnancy. In reality this Muslim boy had been bought from his poor mother by Shi Pei Pu.

Bernard Boursicot with his so-called "son" by his Chinese lover

The ability to pull off this stunt is a tribute to the talent of the opera singer and performer, but why did Shi Pei Pu commit this fraud? Well, he/she was not only a star at the Beijing scene, but also a dedicated Chinese spy who wanted to extract as much information from his/her French lover as possible.

The former lovers, Bernard Boursicot and Shi Pei Pu, in the French court where they were sentenced for espionage 

In 1983 both Boursicot and Shi Pei Pu were arrested on charges of espionage and in 1986 they were convicted and sentenced to six years in prison. By then it was revealed how the young Frenchman had been deluded by the Chinese spy and opera singer. However, Shi Pei Pu refused to say that he had deluded anyone about his true gender, because, as he said: "I never stated it." This strange love affair was turned into a Broadway production, "M. Butterfly" by David Henry Hwang which later also was to be filmed by David Cronenberg.

What I find extremely interesting in this "love affair" is the ability of Shi Pei Pu to play act as the opposite sex, to know how to engage in sexual acts of the opposite sex while hiding his own.

 

https://china-underground.com/2022/05/02/the-incredible-story-of-the-chinese-spy-shi-pei-pu/ 

 

https://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1946375_1946448_1948269,00.html 

 

Wikipedia 

 

torsdag den 10. juli 2025

When One's STOLEN IDENTITY Commits Crimes


From this total baby cuteness to this not so cute??? 


Well, havoc of all kinds may also bring extreme changes into the life and looks of cute child actors like e.g. Brian Bonsall, but this special case is more weird than a case of "what may happen in the life of somebody": The grown-up man in the above photo simply stole the name and fame of the former child star, calling himself "Brian Bonsall", but in reality being the serial rapist Nathan Loebe. When brought to court, he was sentenced to 274 years in prison, which means that he shall never be released, no matter what. 

The rapist "borrowed" the name of the former child actor to make an impact on his female victims, and it seemed to work, because Brian Bonsall had been extremely popular when a child.

I suppose he is best known for his childhood role in the sitcom "Family Ties", but he also had success in grown-up roles, e.g. as Alexander Rozhenko in "Star Trek". 

 

He has made all right as a rock musician, singer and guitarist, but he may still be best remembered as the cute child actor. However, some may also know him as the drunken hooligan who was indicted over partner violence and the use of narcotics. Actually, that happened several times, and that's when he met Nathan Loebe, who decided to steal his identity. Brian Bonsall has told reporters that he quite often met people who asked him whether he was the "real Bonsall" or not, which was a question he found very weird, as he was whom he had always been, namely the former child actor who had made an impact on many fans when he was very young. Not until the arrest of Nathan Loebe did he understand that he had been played by an ID-thief who committed crimes, (mis-)using his name. 

 

https://6abc.com/serial-rapist-sentenced-to-274-years-tiscon-arizona-nathan-loebe/5311220/ 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-14548533/family-ties-brian-bonsall-rapist-stole-identity-attack-women-jail.html 

 

https://moviedelic.com/nathan-loebe/ 

 

https://6abc.com/post/man-gets-274-years-in-prison-for-raping-7-women/5311220/ 

 

https://www.denverpost.com/2010/04/08/former-child-star-bonsall-pleads-guilty-in-assault-probation-violation/ 

 

 Wikipedia