Donald Trump And Women

 

According to Donald Trump's own sayings, this is what he has done to real women, someone of flesh and blood, so to speak. Obviously enough it's a grave insult, overstepping whatever boundaries there are for a woman's free will, her dignity as a fellow human being, and all forms of social conventions. As we know, that kind of conventions have the purpose of securing peace without any skirmishes where two different groups of people interact. Without some kind of rules, it would very often end in chaos and that's something that nobody wants because it disrupts a productive and pleasant life for both parties. Still, Donald Trump doesn't follow rules, especially when it comes to women whom he seems to think are there "for the grabbing".

Well, that's not quite as easy or acceptable as he thinks. For instance, many women and some teenagers have accused him of rape, some of them being very young indeed. 

Maybe this scenery is something that went too far, maybe not: 

It's obvious that Donald Trump has his own private system of labelling women according to their usefulness for him. First there are "trophies", like e.g. his wives, but only up to a point, namely until he divorces them. When his third wife, Melania, wanted to have a child, he made her promise that the pregnancy wouldn't ruin her looks, which are what makes her a trophy. Her trophy-value only lasts as long as she keeps her looks. I remember an interview about why he left his first wife, Ivana, and he said something about how her three pregnancies had made her "slack down there". Besides, she had become more like a business colleague than a wife which was something he obviously resented very much, maybe because she was good at what she was doing. Pretty and sexually useful, that was her role in his life, and when that wasn't what it had been he left her.

The photo of a mature Ivana (to the left) as compared to the one to the right tells a story of how age changes the looks of people naturally, but to Trump that may seem like a kind of betrayal: When he looks at her value as a trophy she is not as much of a catch as what she was when she was young, namely in the eyes of the world. When her "career" as a Trump-wife ended, she became something that might be called a "tool", and that is what happens to all women who are not trophies. These women he often makes an effort to humiliate, no matter who they are, and the humiliation will most likely go on their looks, like in the case of the young female journalist he called "Piggy", although he was the most pig-like of the pair of them. 

His favorite word for the non-trophy-category of women is "nasty". The "nastiness" comes from their not conforming to him and his needs of establishing his status as the "king of the hill". He simply hates those who challenge him by not assuring him of this assumed higher status, maybe because they themselves hold an equally high status, don't let him get away with categorizing them after looks or simply are self-assured in a manner he sees as threatening. To him, it's an awful situation when women compete with him - or maybe just with some man who doesn't have to be him. He has a very stereotype image of women, and if they "step out of line" he tries to put them back in place. Women are for looks and sexual consumption.

  

https://www.themirror.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-piggy-reporter-psychology-1516134 

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-calls-female-reporters-ugly-piggy/ 

 

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mary-trump-exposes-why-her-uncle-donald-keeps-attacking-female-reporters/ 

 

The Monster Drawing

Who is this, and whom is he trying to strangle? It looks like some kind of monster, but as we know the one who is a monster to someone, may be an angel to someone else. That makes it quite difficult to define anybody as a genuine and stable monster: There is no water-proof, staying definition that excludes all shades of doubt. For instance, it has been a weird experience to see someone like e.g. Adolph Hitler changing from monster-status into someone being extolled as a kind of idol. I always saw him as the king of monsters, although he himself isn't unparalleled: History speaks of many evil and cruel people, and he is just one out of many. Who knows what the artist painting this gruesome scenery - Sergey Kolesow - had in mind, was it someone specific or was he out to picture cruelty as such?

https://designyoutrust.com/2016/03/to-the-vanishing-point-the-obscure-broken-worlds-of-artist-sergey-kolesov/

https://awesomerobo.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-art-of-sergey-kolesov.html

When The Mother Becomes One's "Child"

Screen legend Rita Hayworth undoubtedly was very beautiful. She had made her name after what was reputed to have been a very troublesome childhood with a father who may/may not have abused her. She had been married to and had a daughter with one of the movie geniuses of that time: Orson Welles. They look like an ill-fitted couple and the marriage didn't last long: 1943–1947. 

Their daughter, Rebecca Welles, was the spitting image of her father, but they didn't see much of each other after the split up of the Hayworth-Welles marriage. For instance, it seems that he never knew that she had given birth to a son at the age of 21, and that he was set up for adoption right after birth. Young Rebecca may not even have seen him when he was born, but it's obvious that he too took after Orson Welles, and not Rita Hayworth as to looks:

Marc McKerrow, the illegitimate son of Rebecca Welles

Being the firstborn child of Rita Hayworth didn't bring mother and daughter close. Rebecca didn't understand that her mother, who had become a heavy drinker also suffered from Alzheimer. They were not close, but her younger half-sister, Princess Yasmin Aga Khan, who stemmed from the much publicized marriage of the screen legend and the very well-known, charismatic Islamic playboy, Prince Aly Khan became her mother's fierce champion when she found out what her problem was. 

As a young woman Yasmin looked like she might be her mother's twin, but to many people she may first and foremost have been a descendant of the Prophet Muhammad through his daughter, Fatima. 

Yasmin went into a fierce fight for Alzheimer-patients. She founded The Rita Hayworth Gala and is recognized as a strong force behind the global research in and treatment of this grave illness. When her mother died in 1987 that didn't put a stop to her enthusiasm for the cause. However, at that time she herself had become a mother, namely to a dashing son, Andrew Embiricos, who was a young man who had his own problems. 

This handsome young man apparently was a troubled soul who had engaged in the business of making porn. Most probably that was how he had contracted HIV which may be the reason for what happened when he was no more than 25 years old: He was found dead in what appears to have been a suicide. Much in his life looks rather shady, but it's not quite confirmed what happened when he died. Was the plastic bag over his head for suicide, or was it for some kind of autoeroticism? It may even have been something worse, like e.g. homicide, but it has never been found out exactly what happened. He was the only child of his mother, but it seems that they weren't close, and that she may not have known what was going on in his life. She was so very engaged in the Alzheimer cause that she had no eye for HIV or Aids: Her life was so tied up with the concern for the older generation of her family, that she seems to have forgotten the younger one. I suppose that in a way her mother became "her child", who overshadowed her son which I find sad.

 

https://nypost.com/2011/12/06/hayworth-grandson-suicide/ 

 

https://people.com/celebrity/rita-hayworths-grandson-andrew-embiricos-dead/  

 

https://www.wisemuslimwomen.org/a-to-z-of-islam/f/fatima/ 

 

https://wellesnet.com/recalling-rebecca-welles-daughter-of-rita-hayworth-and-orson-welles-10-years-after-her-death/ 

 

Wikipedia 

Cruel Execution

 

Much as I despise this disgusting individual, I think (hope?!!!) I would curb my (in my opinion) fully understandable lust for revenge or just the wish to "blot him out". I see him as one of the most despicable creatures of this century, both because of what he does, has done and plans to do and for being whom he is: An egomaniac, a pedophile, rapist, cheat, embezzler, grifter and - in my opinion - a criminal, yes, maybe even a murderer of several people. For instance, Epstein died at a very convenient time, as did Ivana, and both of them had wounds that didn't fit the story of their death.

What happened in that, by now, very famous prison cell with the 11 sheets? Nobody knows for sure, but the guesses are many and persistent: If it wasn't a suicide, then what happened, and who did this to him if he didn't do it himself?

I'm one of those who think that these two men had a business relationship of some art and not only a friendship: Actually, I, for one, suspect that The Orange Menace was more than a friend and customer of Epstein. If the allegations of one of the victims, Maria Farmer, are trustworthy then his then wife, Ivana, may have been into trafficking herself for a while which also makes her husband a suspect. In my opinion there are details in the tRump-Epstein-relationship that hasn't been seen - or seen for what they are - as Maria Farmer has told of how she, Ivana and her friend, Ghislaine went out scouting for underage girls to the Epstein-trafficking-business. If that's true, then it opens up to many new questions about the real nature of the relationship of tRump and Epstein. That should make it clear that I don't in the least like him, but what would I be, or become, if I took out my revenge in one of the cruel manners that have been used up through history? Well, I would become someone I don't want to spend time with, so to speak: There are, and should be, limits to cruelty and revenge. 

 

No matter what, I wouldn't allow myself - or others - to do to Don the Con what some people in the past have done to their enemies. Actually, there are several instances of something that might be called "over-kill" where someone in power takes it upon him-/herself to punish an individual they feel deserves the worst of the worst. Some of these "over-kill"-instances sort of turn grotesque for what is the use of this extreme cruelty? For instance, one may find it awful that the leader of the Dutch revolt, William the Silent of the House og Orange was murdered by Balthazar Gérard (c. 1557–1584), but the fact that it led to an extremely brutal and painful execution of his murderer doesn't bring him back, and this torture just is too much. Not even the orange Menace would deserve something like e.g. "drawing and Quartering".

Balthazar Gerard 

Wikipedia: To read what was done to him makes it obvious that he must have looked forward to the last stage of the torture when he was quartered and disemboweled alive, his heart was torn out and flung in his face before his head was cut off. I often said that I think Don the Con owes Old Sparky a date for high treason in stealing documents, and other grave crimes, but to see his heart - if he has one, which is debatable - flung into his face is too much. Many people would love to kick his butt, but not something like that. 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balthasar_G%C3%A9rard 

 

https://www.britannica.com/topic/drawing-and-quartering 

 

"Caressed in Life": Poem by Else Cederborg

 

 

"Caressed In Life": Poem by Else Cederborg

Cornered in by walls of misery

is that your given place in life?

I don't think so, never shall

no walls can blot out your existence

not even those made of misery

You live, reluctantly, but you do

something within carries you along

you even float without realizing it

Believe my word: Next you're going to soar

To make you reach that star you call yours

tender hands support you and caress you

lovingly they stroke your cheek, support your feet

don't ever think they don't because they do

caressed and loved in life are you - yes, YOU .…

Stalking Young Queen Victoria

Queen Victoria, 20 years old 

She was not considered a beauty, but the idea of someone that young becoming the Queen of England, thus gaining a lot of power, even though she is a woman, did set "flies in the bonnet" of some of her male subjects. Some tried to shoot her for reasons best known to themselves, but which we may guess at. Others courted her in futile attempts to attract her attention for romance. In her teens she herself was infatuated by Lord Melbourne, who undeniably was a handsome man.

Lord Melbourne instructs the young Queen Victoria.

Victoria might adore the Lord, but I've never heard anything about him being in love with or just attracted to her. However, she didn't lack suitors as several men did have some kind of feelings for her, either of a non-romantic, mercenary art or something else: Sexual attraction. One of these "men" was a teenager who has gained everlasting fame by stalking her in a special and somewhat weird manner. The name of this teenager was Edward "Boy" Jones (1824– c. 1893 or 1896), and he didn't in the least belong to her social circles: He was a chimney sweep who several times broke into Buckingham Palace in order to steal her underwear, letters and whatever items he could get his hands on. That can't have been an easy exploit, as the palace of course was heavily guarded and she was protected in any way possible, so one wonders at his bravery in doing something like that to get what he wanted. By the way, it seems he stole her underwear and carried it out of the palace stuck into his trousers which I find both funny as well as kind of suggestive.

When he was caught - and that also happened several times - he received a sentence of hard labor for some months, but that didn't make him stop his habit of stalking the Queen so he was sent to Australia for 10 years. When he came back he just went on as a burglar for some time, before he decided to go back to Australia.
 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-12342921 

 

Wikipedia 

 

Turning One's Back On The Patriarchy

 

Yup, and the Korean women who started the 4B-Movement really mean business: No men, no dating, no sex, no marriage and no babies. The declining Korean birth rate tells a true story of women who have had enough. However, they don't fight the Patriarchy in the same manner as e.g. the feminists of the 1970's which had an element of ongoing discussion: The women believed in men's ability to listen and learn, but the 4B-women have given up on the male gender altogether.

The movement has been spreading for quite some time, and after the American 2024 election of the ultra male chauvenist, the blatant misogynist, and women abuser, Donald tRump, American women also have become interested in the movement: The incels may lament their situation as men who can't get a date, using the old tricks of "seduction" and living by the outdated rules for how the sexes make an interaction work. Not so long ago  women were caught in a web of sex roles that didn't give them much room for designing their own, independent lives. They have had to suppress themselves for a long time to fit into the pre-conceived ideologies that kept them in a fierce stronghold of suppressive ideas about womanhood, and they have become fed up with that system.

Actually, The 4B-movement has spread globally from South Korea to the US, China, and Australia - perhaps even more. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it has gained access to Muslim countries which uphold a grotesquely twisted system of gender control. If not I'm sure it will come.  

Wikipedia

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/nov/15/4b-south-korea-feminist-movement-donald-trump-election-backlash 

 

https://theconversation.com/a-woman-is-not-a-baby-making-machine-a-brief-history-of-south-koreas-4b-movement-and-why-its-making-waves-in-america-243355 

 

https://www.service95.com/4b-movement-explainer 

 

https://studybreaks.com/culture/womens-bodies-the-4b-movement-and-eradicating-men/ 

 

https://www.koreaherald.com/article/2738770 

  

Video: https://youtu.be/x2PCugCIyyY?si=XDRdI_yEDDejcRPB 

 

 

 

The Dead Man Who Never Existed

 

Some lives look normal, but are anything but ordinary. For instance there is/was the man who checked into the Irish Sligo City Hotel in June 2009. Presumaby his name was "Peter Bergmann", and he was an Austrian with a non-disclosed reason to visit Ireland. For the next couple of days he was caught on various business cameras throughout the town, busy distributing some of his belongings. Some days after checking at the hotel his dead body was found on a popular beach, and this started a lengthy investigation about him, his identity and his reasons for visiting Ireland. However, nothing came of this police investigation, except one thing: He didn't exist and never had existed, as there are no records of him anywhere. People didn't forget about this weird case of non-existence, and in 2013 there was a documentary, "The Last Days of Peter Bergman", about it. The interest and fascination was such that it has become very popular with the members of some websites. They still discuss the strange case of a man who died in Ireland, presumably, without having been alive anywhere else ....